SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 32,676
- Like
- 62,966
I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of the non-conference season, the ACC season and the post season.
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Tyus Battle 20NP in 38 minutes
Frank Howard 8NP in 27 minutes
Elijah Hughes 8NP in 36 minutes
Paschal Chukwu 7NP in 18 minutes
Marek Dolezaj 7NP in 26 minutes
Buddy Boeheim 5NP in 16 minutes
Oshae Brissett 2NP in 31 minutes
Bourama Sidibe -1NP in 8 minutes
DNP coach’s decision
Robert Braswell and Jalen Carey
Injured
None
Out for the year
Howard Washington
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Tyus Battle 29 points + 5 assists = 34
Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)
Tyus Battle 29 points – 10 mfg – 3 mft = +16
Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Buddy Boeheim 8 of 14 possible points = 57.1%
Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half?)
1st Half- Frank Howard trey 23 seconds in
2nd Half- Frank Howard trey 42 seconds in
TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
Tyus Battle with a free throw with 8:29 left.
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Tyus Battle 38 minutes
TEAM STATS
Possession
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 8 of our 28 misses = 22.2%
They rebounded 18 of their 35 misses = 51.4%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 13 points on 8 O-Rebs = 1.625 points/O-reb
They got 16 points on 18 O-Rebs = 0.889 points/O-reb
Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 10 turnovers – 5 steals = 5 unforced
They had 9 turnovers – 5 steals = 4 unforced
Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 7 points from 9 takeaways = 0.778 points/takeaway
They had 15 points from 10 takeaways = 1.286 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 20 points in 17 unsettled situations = 1.176 points
They had 31 points in 28 unsettled situations = 1.107 points
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 25 + 9 = 34
They had 46 + 10 = 56
Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 25 + 5 + 3 = 33
They had 46 + 5 + 2 = 53
Scoring
Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 15 for 29 on twos, (51.7%), 14 for 31 on threes (45.2%) and 13 for 23 on frees (56.5%)
They were 16 for 33 on twos, (48.5%), 9 for 29 on threes (31.0%) and 34 for 37 on frees (91.9%)
Combined percentages were: 1534 (517 + 452 + 565) vs. 1714 (485 + 310 + 919) = -180
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers
We had 22 PIP, 50 POP, 42 OL, 8 TZ, 7 POTO, 4 FBP
They had 26 PIP, 33 POP, 27 OL, 6 TZ, 15 POTO, 15 FBP
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 4 FBP in 25 opportunities (16.0%)
They scored 15 FBP in 35 opportunities (42.9%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 55 FCP and 13 SCP
They had 28 FCP and 16 SCP
Last Possessions
(Points scored on the last full possession of a half, a game or an overtime period.)
We scored 3 points
They scored 2 points
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 69 points and our bench scored 16 points
Their starters scored 75 points and their bench scored 18 points
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 17 of our 29 field goals = 58.6%
They assisted 19 of their 25 field goals = 76.0%
Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 85 points in 72 possessions = 1.181 points/ possession
They scored 93 points in 71 possessions = 1.310 points/possession
It was a 143 possession game.
Team Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)
We scored 85 points, missed 31 field goals and 10 missed free throws = net 44
They scored 93 points, missed 37 field goals and 3 missed free throws = net 53
(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)
We scored 85 on 29 two point attempts, 31 three point attempts and 23 free throw attempts = 85 of a possible 174 points = 48.9% of possible points scored.
They scored 93 on 33 two point attempts, 29 three point attempts and 37 free throw attempts = 93 of a possible 190 points = 48.9% of possible points scored.
Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)
23-20, 23-21, 17-26, 22-24
Fouls
(Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 29 two point shots, attempted 23 free throws and were fouled 18 times = 1.61; 1.28
They attempted 33 two point shots, attempted 37 free throws and were fouled 26 times = 1.27; 1.42
They were more likely to get calls when attempting two point shots and got more free throws per foul by significant margins.
Comments
- We got tacos for the first time this month! The last time we scored 70+ points was the first Boston College game on 1/30.
- I realize that North Carolina is the better rebounding team, although they aren’t as tall as our team, (6-9, 6-8, 6-6 up front when Little is in). I realize that it’s harder to rebound from a zone than a man-for-man, (although we are only in a zone when on defense). But getting out-rebounded 25-46, rebounding 22% of our misses while they rebound 51% of theirs, is a bit much.
- How did we stay in this game against such a rebounding advantage? We kept playing defense even when we didn’t get the ball. They scored 16 points off of 18 offensive rebounds. We scored 13 off of 8. That means we were twice as likely to score when we got the ball back as they were. Of all the rare stats in a game full of them, that’s probably the rarest.
- JB likes the zone because he feels that a rebounding deficit can be made up for in turnover margin. It usually works but in this game we were -21 on the boards and -1 in turnover margin. That’s -22. We’ve had one other game this year when we were minus double figures in what I call “manufactured possessions”: we were -13 vs. Buffalo. So this was by far the worst game this year in terms of possessing the ball.
- By the usual possession formula, FGA – O-Reb + TO + (.475 x FTA), we had 72 possessions and they had 71. But let’s eliminate the middle two stats so we consider an offensive rebound an extra possession and a turnover one less possession. Now it’s 71 possessions for Syracuse and 79 for North Carolina. Our efficiency goes from 85/72 = 1.181 to 85/71 = 1.197. Theirs goes from 93/71 = 1.310 to 93/79 = 1.177. By that we were more offensive efficient team but they won it on possessions.
- It’s amazing that we dominated the opening sets with 55-28 First Chance Points and yet lost by 8. We got out-run 4-15 in Fast Break Points and out-scored from the line 13-34. That’s why we lost.
- We just played teams ranked #18, #1 and #5 and our bench out-scored theirs by a combined 50-36: 22-14, 12-4 and 16-18. Who says JB never plays his bench?
- Both teams scored 48.9% of the points they would have scored if all their shots went in. But they would have won by 16 rather than 8 because they were +14 in free throw attempts. (They tried 4 more two point shots and we tried 2 more treys.)
- The real fouls discrepancy was in the first half: We attempted 17 two point shots and drew 6 fouls (2.83) while they attempted 12 two point shots and got 14 whistles (0.86). We attempted 5 free throws on 6 fouls, (0.83) while they went to the line 21 times on 14 fouls (1.50). They were three times as likely to get the call and twice as likely to get free throws out of it.
Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)
Tyus Battle 20NP in 38 minutes
Frank Howard 8NP in 27 minutes
Elijah Hughes 8NP in 36 minutes
Paschal Chukwu 7NP in 18 minutes
Marek Dolezaj 7NP in 26 minutes
Buddy Boeheim 5NP in 16 minutes
Oshae Brissett 2NP in 31 minutes
Bourama Sidibe -1NP in 8 minutes
DNP coach’s decision
Robert Braswell and Jalen Carey
Injured
None
Out for the year
Howard Washington
Awards
Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Tyus Battle 29 points + 5 assists = 34
Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)
Tyus Battle 29 points – 10 mfg – 3 mft = +16
Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Buddy Boeheim 8 of 14 possible points = 57.1%
Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half?)
1st Half- Frank Howard trey 23 seconds in
2nd Half- Frank Howard trey 42 seconds in
TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
Tyus Battle with a free throw with 8:29 left.
My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Tyus Battle 38 minutes
TEAM STATS
Possession
Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 8 of our 28 misses = 22.2%
They rebounded 18 of their 35 misses = 51.4%
Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 13 points on 8 O-Rebs = 1.625 points/O-reb
They got 16 points on 18 O-Rebs = 0.889 points/O-reb
Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 10 turnovers – 5 steals = 5 unforced
They had 9 turnovers – 5 steals = 4 unforced
Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 7 points from 9 takeaways = 0.778 points/takeaway
They had 15 points from 10 takeaways = 1.286 points/takeaway
Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 20 points in 17 unsettled situations = 1.176 points
They had 31 points in 28 unsettled situations = 1.107 points
Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 25 + 9 = 34
They had 46 + 10 = 56
Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 25 + 5 + 3 = 33
They had 46 + 5 + 2 = 53
Scoring
Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 15 for 29 on twos, (51.7%), 14 for 31 on threes (45.2%) and 13 for 23 on frees (56.5%)
They were 16 for 33 on twos, (48.5%), 9 for 29 on threes (31.0%) and 34 for 37 on frees (91.9%)
Combined percentages were: 1534 (517 + 452 + 565) vs. 1714 (485 + 310 + 919) = -180
Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers
We had 22 PIP, 50 POP, 42 OL, 8 TZ, 7 POTO, 4 FBP
They had 26 PIP, 33 POP, 27 OL, 6 TZ, 15 POTO, 15 FBP
Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 4 FBP in 25 opportunities (16.0%)
They scored 15 FBP in 35 opportunities (42.9%)
First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 55 FCP and 13 SCP
They had 28 FCP and 16 SCP
Last Possessions
(Points scored on the last full possession of a half, a game or an overtime period.)
We scored 3 points
They scored 2 points
Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 69 points and our bench scored 16 points
Their starters scored 75 points and their bench scored 18 points
Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 17 of our 29 field goals = 58.6%
They assisted 19 of their 25 field goals = 76.0%
Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 85 points in 72 possessions = 1.181 points/ possession
They scored 93 points in 71 possessions = 1.310 points/possession
It was a 143 possession game.
Team Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)
We scored 85 points, missed 31 field goals and 10 missed free throws = net 44
They scored 93 points, missed 37 field goals and 3 missed free throws = net 53
(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)
We scored 85 on 29 two point attempts, 31 three point attempts and 23 free throw attempts = 85 of a possible 174 points = 48.9% of possible points scored.
They scored 93 on 33 two point attempts, 29 three point attempts and 37 free throw attempts = 93 of a possible 190 points = 48.9% of possible points scored.
Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)
23-20, 23-21, 17-26, 22-24
Fouls
(Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 29 two point shots, attempted 23 free throws and were fouled 18 times = 1.61; 1.28
They attempted 33 two point shots, attempted 37 free throws and were fouled 26 times = 1.27; 1.42
They were more likely to get calls when attempting two point shots and got more free throws per foul by significant margins.
Comments
- We got tacos for the first time this month! The last time we scored 70+ points was the first Boston College game on 1/30.
- I realize that North Carolina is the better rebounding team, although they aren’t as tall as our team, (6-9, 6-8, 6-6 up front when Little is in). I realize that it’s harder to rebound from a zone than a man-for-man, (although we are only in a zone when on defense). But getting out-rebounded 25-46, rebounding 22% of our misses while they rebound 51% of theirs, is a bit much.
- How did we stay in this game against such a rebounding advantage? We kept playing defense even when we didn’t get the ball. They scored 16 points off of 18 offensive rebounds. We scored 13 off of 8. That means we were twice as likely to score when we got the ball back as they were. Of all the rare stats in a game full of them, that’s probably the rarest.
- JB likes the zone because he feels that a rebounding deficit can be made up for in turnover margin. It usually works but in this game we were -21 on the boards and -1 in turnover margin. That’s -22. We’ve had one other game this year when we were minus double figures in what I call “manufactured possessions”: we were -13 vs. Buffalo. So this was by far the worst game this year in terms of possessing the ball.
- By the usual possession formula, FGA – O-Reb + TO + (.475 x FTA), we had 72 possessions and they had 71. But let’s eliminate the middle two stats so we consider an offensive rebound an extra possession and a turnover one less possession. Now it’s 71 possessions for Syracuse and 79 for North Carolina. Our efficiency goes from 85/72 = 1.181 to 85/71 = 1.197. Theirs goes from 93/71 = 1.310 to 93/79 = 1.177. By that we were more offensive efficient team but they won it on possessions.
- It’s amazing that we dominated the opening sets with 55-28 First Chance Points and yet lost by 8. We got out-run 4-15 in Fast Break Points and out-scored from the line 13-34. That’s why we lost.
- We just played teams ranked #18, #1 and #5 and our bench out-scored theirs by a combined 50-36: 22-14, 12-4 and 16-18. Who says JB never plays his bench?
- Both teams scored 48.9% of the points they would have scored if all their shots went in. But they would have won by 16 rather than 8 because they were +14 in free throw attempts. (They tried 4 more two point shots and we tried 2 more treys.)
- The real fouls discrepancy was in the first half: We attempted 17 two point shots and drew 6 fouls (2.83) while they attempted 12 two point shots and got 14 whistles (0.86). We attempted 5 free throws on 6 fouls, (0.83) while they went to the line 21 times on 14 fouls (1.50). They were three times as likely to get the call and twice as likely to get free throws out of it.
Last edited:
