Playoffs! 2016- The States - Semi-Finals and Finals match-ups | Syracusefan.com

Playoffs! 2016- The States - Semi-Finals and Finals match-ups

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,517
Like
62,713
CLASS AA

There will be no Section III team in the Dome playing for a a state title for the first time since 2013 as both CBA in Class AA and Whitesboro in Class A went down hard is similar games. CBA was down by only 13-15 at halftime to Section 5’s Victor but got steamrolled 0-27 in the second half for 13-42 final. As has bene the case in the past, the Brothers had plenty of speed but seemed to lack the muscle in the trenches of top teams from other sections. Even when they won the title from New Rochelle in 2004, they were getting beaten in much the same way until Ray Rice got injured and then Greg Paulus was able to amount an amazing comeback. Victor didn’t have a Ray Rice but didn’t need one because they were so dominant in the trenches and CBA had no Greg Paulus.
Victor erupts in second half to crush CBA, advances to Class AA state title game


Section 2’s Troy used three successive late fourth quarter sacks to don Section 1’s New Rochelle 20-14:
Troy football tops New Rochelle for spot in state final

This sets up a final Achilles would love: Tory vs. Victor. Watch out for the gift horse!


CLASS A

Like CBA, Section III’s Whitesboro seemed in good shape at halftime, tied with Section 5’s Greece Athena 14-14. Then came the third quarter. An interceptions and two botched kick-off returns produced three touchdowns in 6 minutes for the Trojan and blew the game open to a 21-41 final:
Whitesboro bounced from Class A state semifinals after third quarter implosion

Section 1’s Somers beat Section 2’s Burnt Hills-Balston Lake 48-24. It was all about big plays. Somers got two 60+ scoring passes and a 52 yard run to blow it open.
H.S. Football: Burnt Hills’ season ends in state semifinal loss to Somers


CLASS B

Section 4’s Chenango Forks continued its march to a fourth straight state title continued with a 41-8 demolition of Section 6’s Dunkirk:
Devilish dominance: Forks a win from another title

Section 2’s Glens Falls had a pleasant day against Section 1’s Pleasantville, winning, 49-14.
Glens Falls downs Pleasantville, heads to Dome


CLASS C

Section 4’s Newark Valley used a big second half to overcome three first half turnovers and advance to the Dome, beating Section 5’s Bishop Kearney, 34-14:
Bishop Kearney loses to top-ranked Newark Valley

Ogdensburg Free Academy became a rare Section 10 team, (they represent the St. Lawrence area) to make it to the state final, beating Section 9’s Burke Catholic 35-28. There are only 5 Class C teams in Section 10 but there are only 4 of them in section 9, which represents the Catskill area., which is why entire section ahs ever produced a state champion in this class.
Burke comes up short in state Class C semifinal


CLASS D


Section 4’s Sydney ran out of miracles vs. #1 ranked Maple Grove of Section 6, losing 20-56, (not far from what might have been their margin of defeat if Onondaga hadn’t twice fumbled the ball into the end zone in the fourth quarter. This game was 42-6 at half time so there was no potential for late-game heroics. However, the Red Dragons suffered some injuries that may limit them in the Dome next week.
Hurts So Good | News, Sports, Jobs - Post Journal

Section 2’s Cambridge at 11-0 did figure to have much problem with 3-6 Haldane, a representative of Section1, which has only two Class D teams, and they didn’t, winning 61-6. Now it gets real.
Cambridge mows down Haldane in state semifinal
 
FINALS MATCH-UPS

CLASS AA

Section 2- Troy 12-0 (438-133) NYSSWA #2 MaxPreps 3/357 States: 16-5 with 2 titles
Vs.
Section 5- Victor 12-0 (379-113) NYSSWA #1 MaxPreps 1/224 States: 4-3 with 0 titles

Comment: This is what you’ve got to love: two trains on the same track, heading for each other. Victor is #1 but Troy has much the better pedigree. We’ll see if either of those things matter.

CLASS A

Section 1- Somers 11-1 (450-181) NYSSWA #4 MaxPreps 9/850 States: 2-3 with 0 titles
Vs.
Section 5- Greece Athena 12-0 (437-161) NYSSWA #2 MaxPreps 5/611 States: 2-0 with 0 titles

Comment: Neither team has ever won anything at the state level or even made it to the finals. But they are there now and somebody is going to win their first ever state title. (Note the #1 and #3 teams are in Section 8, which doesn’t participate in the state tournament. )

CLASS B

Section 2- Glens Falls 12-0 (546-147) NYSSWA #2 MaxPreps 4/545 States: 5-2 with 0 titles
Vs.
Section 4- Chenango Forks 12-0 (464-99) NYSSWA #1 MaxPreps 2/234 States: 28-9 with 5 titles

Comments: Is Chenango Forks invincible? Probably not. I would favor the Patriots, Alabama and probably North Dakota State. The question is: can anybody in New York State, specifically in Class B beat them? Maybe. Glens Falls looks pretty impressive. Maine Endwell lost last year after 62 straight wins and 4 straight state titles. Hornell lost in 2012 after 51 straight wins and three straight state titles. Chenango Forks won 38 in a row and two straight state titles until they got beat in 2005 by Rye, who had lost to them 0-48 in the finals the year before. Presently Forks has won three straight state titles, (all in Class C), and 22 games in a row, (they play Maine-Endwell). They could certainly lose, too. Or not. ( The #2 team is in Section 8.) Forks went down in MaxPreps state ratings from #1 to #2 but improved from #276 to #234 in their national rankings. Go figure.

CLASS C

Section 10-Ogdensburg Free Academy 10-2 (504-204) NYSSWA #2 MaxPreps 92/4173 States: 2-4 with 0 titles
Vs.
Section 4- Newark Valley 12-0 (518-97) NYSSWA #1 MaxPreps 17/1433 States: 2-0 with 0 title

Comment: Ogdensburg has scored a lot of points against shallow competition. I think Newark Valley will prove to be much the better team.

CLASS D

Section 2- Cambridge 12-0 (662-87) NYSSWA #2 MaxPreps 59/3261 States: 17-12 with 1 title
Vs.
Section 6- Maple Grove 12-0 (509-86) NYSSWA #1 MaxPreps 13/1116 States: 9-5 with 2 titles

Comment: Again, we have the two trains chugging toward each other, both with a strong pedigree as well. Cambridge has won by an average score of 55-7 and Maple Grove by an average of 42-7. Cambridge’s closest game was a 27 points win – and so was Maple Grove’s. I just hope the injuries Maple Grove sustained in the semi-finals won’t hold them back because this one looks like it could be fun.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
167,564
Messages
4,712,134
Members
5,909
Latest member
jc824

Online statistics

Members online
35
Guests online
1,680
Total visitors
1,715


Top Bottom