Swofford may be an idiot

Discussion in 'Syracuse Football Board' started by omniorange, May 2, 2012.

  1. omniorange

    omniorange All Conference

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    1,981
    http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/blog/brett-mcmurphy/18938708

    Re-posted from Conference Realignment Board:
    From the article:

    If a conference champion was among the top six in the rankings, it would automatically qualify for the four-team playoff. The top four ranked conference champions among the top six would qualify and if less than four conference champions were among the top six teams then the remaining spots would be filled by the highest ranked non-conference champions or an independent (Notre Dame, BYU, Army or Navy).

    This achieves the same result I had suggested for the compromise (top 3 conference champions but an at-large could bump a fourth conference champ if they were 'x' spots ahead of the fourth conference champ).

    This is a cleaner way of addressing and communicating both the #2 Alabama of 2011 issue and the #6 Louisville of 2006 and the #6 Utah of 2008 issues.

    If the BiG, Pac, Big East, and ACC could rally around this proposal they would be smart to do so.
    ACC commissioner John Swofford said he like's the simplicity of No. 1 vs. No. 4 and No. 2 vs. No. 3.
    Well, that confirms it. He's an idiot.

    Cheers,
    Neil
     
    BORZAK likes this.
  2. tipphill

    tipphill Guest

    far from an idiot
     
  3. Townie72

    Townie72 All Conference

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,743
    Likes Received:
    2,157
    I'm surprised Omni --- a normally rational poster --- would characterize Swofford as an Idiot.

    In comparison to the competition in the other conferences, Swofford seems like a pretty sharp guy who has created a lot of change in the college football landscape. Did it all work out as well as the most optimistic might have wanted? Probably not. But the clock is still running. He certainly took the Big East to the cleaners.

    From a corporate planning perspective, his plan and the execution of it have been near perfect. If only Miami and FSU were what they were, he'd be heralded as a genius.
     
    tipphill likes this.
  4. kingottoiii

    kingottoiii Guest

    I do not know why he would back a system of Top 4. Does he realize that the ACC hasn't been very good as of late? He should be fighting for a Top 8 conference champ so the ACC has a shot. Top 6 they still fail. looking back at past seasons and using the future conference make ups:

    From 2003-2011 (last 9 seasons) the ACC Champ would have qualified just ONCE and they would have had ZERO at large. By comparison the SEC Champ 8 times (9 teams total), P12 Champ 8 times (8 total), B12 Champ 7 times (10 total), B1G Champ 5 times (6 total), and Big East Champ 2 times (2 total).

    Heck during that span the ACC Champ averaged a 10.4 ranking in the BCS. That isn't even close to qualifying. And if I am Delany I want to expand it to include the Top 8 as well because only 5 of 9 years the B1G Champ qualified. If you expand to Top 8 the ACC Champ would have had an additional TWO appearances. The BE Champ an additional one. The B1G would have had 1 less bid and the B12 2 less.

    BTW under a Top 6 it would be possible to have the #1 BCS team not make the playoff. See 2003 where OU was #1 in the BCS but was not B12 champ. Had FSU been #6 instead of #7 then we would have seen #2, #3, #4, and #6 in the playoff.
     
  5. longtimefan

    longtimefan All Conference

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,321
    Likes Received:
    2,151
    I hesitate to characterize another person's post, but. . .

    I think omni was talking specifically about Swofford's position favoring the 1 vs 4, 2 vs 3 playoff format. That is a formula for the ACC to be (often) excluded from the championship race, and a boon to the SEC, and occasionally even the Big 10. This past season, while rather exceptional, is a template for the SEC's continued domination of college football.
     
  6. kingottoiii

    kingottoiii Guest

    Just to further the Top 8 Conf Champ:

    SEC, B12, P12 would make it 8 of last 9 years
    B1G 5 of 9
    ACC, BE 3 of 9

    That would be great for the ACC and BE but stink for the SEC. With a Top 8 Conf Champ system we would have seen only one non Conf Champ make the playoffs (Bama last year). And going forward one would expect the following:

    SEC, B12, P12 Champs make it every year
    B1G Champ two in three years
    ACC Champ one in three years

    I wouldn't expect the BE Champ to make it. Boise is the best program but with a more challenging conf schedule, a BE CG, and more travel it will be harder for them to make it through a season without a L and a Top 8 ranking.
     
  7. SU2NASA

    SU2NASA All American

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    5,563
    Likes Received:
    5,443
    The ACC may be seen as the #5 BCS conference after the B1G, B12, Pac-eleventy, and $EC, but it was Swofford's raid of the Big East that put it in a stable position and made sure it didn't end up in the situation the Big East is in.

    Picking up SU and Pitt to drive the nail into the Big East as a major conference and making the ACC the pre-eminent conference on the eastern seaboard was a great move.
     
  8. Capt. Tuttle

    Capt. Tuttle Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2011
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    7,036
    He may or may not be an idiot, but he's our idiot. :D

    Sent from my Vortex using Tapatalk 2
     
    Shenexon likes this.
  9. KaiserUEO

    KaiserUEO All American

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    7,414
    Likes Received:
    8,837
    being the 5th of 5, yet advocating a 4 team playoff...is genius.

    baby steps and hes shown to be a team player.

    hes already positioned himself to ally with the SEC or b1g when they bitch their 2nd best team is left out and the push for a 6 or 8 team playoff begins.
     
  10. Madbiker

    Madbiker All American

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,559
    Likes Received:
    3,733
    If the goal is to maximize the chance for one of your conference teams to appear in the 4 team playoff then the ACC should support the conference champion model with the cap at being ranked in the top 6 (8 would be even better). An ACC school will be selected more times under that scenario than if they just go with the top 4 ranked teams regardless of being a conference champ. Also it provides ND with an incentive to join a conference. Under the top 4 ranked teams model, ND would have an equal shot with anyone else so there is zero incentive to ever join a conference. I can see why the SEC wants the top 4 ranked teams model (so they have a much greater chance of getting multiple teams in to the playoff) but I can't see at all why Swofford should support that. I can't see any conference other than the SEC supporting it.
     
  11. WoadBlue

    WoadBlue Scout Team

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2011
    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    259
    Swofford is agreeing with Mike Slive, who wants the Top 4 in whatever rankings system is used, regardless of conference affiliation, to try to have more SEC vs. SEC National Championship games. He is allying with Slive because the Big Ten and the Pac are going to be even tighter than ticks from here on out, and because standing against the Big Ten is necessary to persuading ND to join the ACC.

    The long term big picture has all these particulars:

    The playoff is not going to remain 4 teams for long. I expect to see many writers calling for 8 teams before the first National semi-final is played. I think we will see 16 not many years after the first 8 team playoff. So where you land right now about how the 4 are chosen is not particularly relevant to what will be the landscape in a few years.

    By the time the playoff is 8 teams, the champs of all Major conferences (and there are 5 now) will be given automatic invites, with certain conditions (at least 9 wins and/or Top 12 ranking, etc.).

    Slive intends to have a conference ally for when the SEC needs it to take on the Rose Bowl Alliance. As Slive and the SEC detest and are smart enough to never trust Texas, and Texas is almost the sole proprietor of the Big XII, Slive has 1 option:the ACC. Swofford from his time talking to Texas last year learned how duplicitous it is and knows its wrath. And he knows that the Rose Bowl Alliance would love to gut the ACC so ND has only 1 option regarding a conference for all sports. Thus Swofford knows that the ACC needs an ally conference: the SEC is the option.

    Slive and the SEC do not want ND in the Big Ten under any circumstances, and would greatly prefer that ND not be in the Big XII for all sports but football, because that might help Big XII basketball at the expense of the SEC. Even with ND in the ACC, Slive and the SEC would not be threatened by ACC football because it would be a league with a bunch of small schools, a quarter of them north of the Mason-Dixon line.

    Swofford has been trying to get ND into the ACC since he became commissioner.
     
  12. sufan

    sufan Scout Team

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    352
    Likes Received:
    72


    Swofford has at least two immediate major challenges: to renegotiate the ACC TV contract with ESPN so the ACC has a payout comparable to the other major conferences and to make sure the ACC is best positioned to participate within the new playoff games, which includes revenue payout.

    Although the ACC has a number of currently and historically strong teams, the rankings are heavily influenced by the assumption the SEC has the strongest teams, with the Big 10 and PAC 12 and Big 12 all having highly ranked teams in recent years.

    It seems obvious the ACC would have the best chance of participating by supporting the proposal of including conference champions ranked in the top 6, and permitting participation of a top ranked "other" team only if there were not 4 top 6 ranked conference champions.
     
  13. omniorange

    omniorange All Conference

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    1,981
    It's only a great move IF the league performs well, particularly in football. And the ACC is already hampered by a bad TV contract and small schools with pitiful fanbases.

    Looking in the rearview mirror and seeing the Big East behind us shouldn't be our focus anymore or be a judgment as to how well a conference commissioner is doing. We need to look at what is in front of us and what it will take to get us on an even playing field with them.

    Cheers,
    Neil
     
    BORZAK likes this.
  14. omniorange

    omniorange All Conference

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    1,981
    Exactly. I'm hoping the ACC presidents see it this way and give Swofford his marching orders.

    Cheers,
    Neil
     
  15. Chip

    Chip Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,438
    Likes Received:
    10,735
    And he's not planning on FSU and Miami being down forever. I would assume he's thinking what's the best case scenario for the ACC when FSU and Miami get closer to where they were in the 90s.

    If he thinks in the now, then he's considered a have not. I wouldn't want to align with that group.
     
  16. SU2NASA

    SU2NASA All American

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Messages:
    5,563
    Likes Received:
    5,443
    The fact that the ACC isn't the Big East is exactly the main reason that Swofford is no idiot.
     
  17. KaiserUEO

    KaiserUEO All American

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    7,414
    Likes Received:
    8,837
    the balance of power is always shifting.

    is it in the midwest(b1g)? cali (usc)? southwest(texas, okie)? the south (flast, mia, fla)? or the deep south(bama, lsu, tenn)?

    to paraphrase a quote line from my favorite NYG board about Eli...the ACC will be fine.

    and at the end of the day.....

    Just Win Baby.

    Oh Lord
     
  18. omniorange

    omniorange All Conference

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    1,981
    Again, focusing on the ACC not being the Big East is the wrong approach. More important to focus on the ACC not being the SEC, the BiG, or now, the Pac. Do posters even realize that the Pac has now surpassed the ACC? And that is with only one King - USC.

    Cheers,
    Neil
     
    BORZAK likes this.
  19. omniorange

    omniorange All Conference

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    1,981
    While I agree that football is cyclical and that eventually both FSU and Miami will turn things around, with SOS rumored to be back in as part of whatever the new rankings will be, that factor alone could hinder the ACC in any Top 4 only playoff.

    As for the belief that an 8-team playoff is around the corner, considering how long it's taken to get to a 4-team playoff I wouldn't hold my breath. Nor, if one comes, will it necessarily take the shape of being one that is played after conference championships.

    Cheers,
    Neil
     
    BORZAK likes this.
  20. arbitragegls

    arbitragegls All Conference

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,347
    Likes Received:
    1,762
    Certainly some interesting and good points spread throughout the thread. But here is another take..."I know the BE (substitute SEC) and the ACC is not one of them"...

    In bringing 'Cuse and Pitt to the ACC, Swofford did as the conference wanted...two teams with basketball prowess and football history that may rise again. He took out the BE in such a way I do not expect it to either survive long and/or be a competitive league as is the ACC, SEC, B1g...etc.
    Basketball was the reason that 'Cuse and Pitt (probably would have 'been 'Cuse and Uconn if BC wasnt such a Nancy--not counting that the Big 12 may have wanted to expand into PA)...so the ACC was driven more by strengthening basketball because that is what it was known for and it was being trumped by the BE...so take 'Cuse and Pitt and get back to #1.
    As far as football is concerned, FSU and Miami are sitting there wanting to get better. If you recall, both teams were strong in the '80s and '90s. If they get back then the ACC becomes important again in football.

    Swofford now has to find two schools to reach 16 that will bring football in as a top sport. Even Coach K said this. It was unfortunate that WVU did not have better academic standard as its all around sports and football capability would have been good for the ACC. If we look over the field and geography, there isnt even a few teams for the ACC to expand with that play good football and are academically strong. In fact, aside from ND, there probably isnt one hanging around right now...so Swofford would have to steal two teams if ND does not come to the ACC. And those teams may have to come from a conference and only teams to raid maybe Penn ST, Vandy, WVU (discussed above) and...damn, hope ND joins cause there isnt a whole lot of good academic and football playing schools left.

    I believe Swofford is a pretty smart guy and everything he does is predicated on first strengthening the ACC and second fighting to get ND to join. Do any of us here believe that in the next five years any football team other than FSU or Miami can be a top 4 or top 6 team. I DO NOT. If that is the case, then support the four team playoff, endeavor to get closer to the SEC...something like B1G and PAC association and bide time. Eventually, ND is going to have to join somewhere as good teams will all be tied up in conferences and may not want to play ND because of tough schedules.

    Lastly, Swofford must negotiate a very good TV package. He has several points in his favor...one demographics of the NE and SE corridor including Florida...one of only two regions really growing at this time and projected into the future...he has one of the two best basketball conferences...and ACC football is okay not great. If this is all about the money, and most of us think it is; than anything Swofford does must be to entice in whatever way that ND joins and no good football teams leave. I doubt that Swofford decided all by himself to support a four team playoff. Something tells me Presidents of Universities and ADs have a lot to say...and Swofford is following their direction and his beliefs.

    What do you think?
     

Web Hosting Service by Host Duplex