You'd think that this type of scoring was a consistent

[GoSU96]

issue with Babers based on some of posts today.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Here is a breakdown of scoring over the last twenty years.

		Scoring
	Games	30+	29-20	19-10	-10	0
2000-2004	59	44%​	20%​	19%​	12%​	5%​
2005-2008	47	15%​	17%​	62%​	15%​	4%​
2009-2012	50	38%​	24%​	28%​	10%​	0%​
2013-2015	37	24%​	38%​	22%​	14%​	3%​
2016-2020	50	48%​	30%​	12%​	8%​	2%​

5 times in 50 games a team under Babers failed to reach 10 pts. Same as Marrone, better than P.

Only P comes close in being able to get to 30 or more.

Thinking that the guy doesn't know what he's doing on that side of the ball is nuts.

The big issue has always been on defense, if they as stout as they were today through 3 quarters, this team has a chance to be better than I thought possible.

People seem to have forgotten just how bad the offense was with Robinson and to a much lesser extent Shafer.

 

[HRE Otto IV]

When we score 30+ under Babers our record is good. When we score under 30 our record is pretty bad. Post Dungey we have scored 30 in only 5 of 13 games.
If the problem isn't the coaching, why fire the OC? And if it is not the coaching, it is the horses. Which of course is brought in by and the fault of the coaching.

Our new D system might change that 30 point W/L magic number slightly. Even if you move that magic number down to 25, we still fail to hit that in 7 of the last 13 games.
UNC last year gave up 26 ppg in conference games and we just scored 6. So for people to worry that this year might be more of what we saw last year is a legit concern.