ACC: 72 team NCAA (E & W 1st 4) & other changes

Madbiker

2018 Iggy Winner ACC Reg Ssn Rcd/Most 3 Ptrs Made
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,158
Likes
6,504
#5
Of course all the coaches favor expanding the field it helps more of them get in which is important to their job security. I'm fine with going to a First 8 but no further. Let's face it, before we became an annual bubble team we wouldn't care at all about this.
 

Eric15

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
13,892
Likes
31,399
#6
I would much rather cut down the field back to 64 than expand it to 72. I've never once watched the tournament and thought to myself "man, this thing sure could use more 18-13 teams to be more exciting."

(yes I know it helped us last year, but I'm thinking big picture)
 

Zelda Zonk

All Conference
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
2,816
Likes
4,336
#9
This kinda feels like a Participation Trophy kind of movement.
But, as mentioned in the article, it's really just '1%' more teams from the overall field. Not going to change the tournament in any profound manner, but in ten years, there will be another rationale to add even more... I'd rather have it at 64 and be done with it.
 

KaiserUEO

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,343
Likes
15,804
#11
If 70 football teams can go bowling, 72 can join the ‘tourny’.

Syracuse is most definitely NOT a bubble team, this doesn’t impact us, but it’s good for the tourny and good for tv.

There’s nothing wrong with staggering games opposite each other on Tuesday and Wednesday like we see Thursday through Sunday.
 

RandygoCuse

All Conference
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
2,254
Likes
2,343
#12
Will it actually make that much more money? Does anyone watch those games they don't have a stake in the outcome? They're not even in any brackets
 

cliftonparksufan

Iggy Award Magistrate
Joined
Aug 14, 2011
Messages
8,911
Likes
11,263
#13
Will it actually make that much more money? Does anyone watch those games they don't have a stake in the outcome? They're not even in any brackets
Basically you might eliminate the NIT and make all teams relevant. Win and advance. Dollar and a dream.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
1,661
Likes
2,015
#18
I’m not opposed specifically to 72 , but where does it end? I’m two years , they’ll want to figure out another way to expand it again. Just keep it the way it is.
 

KaiserUEO

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,343
Likes
15,804
#20
You’re saying we should want to emulate a system that features such events as a “Cheribundi Tart Cherry Boca Raton Bowl” and “Bad Boy Mowers Gasparilla Bowl?”
Yes.

If u don’t want to watch, find another channel.

It’s also 2 more game to bet...
 

jncuse

Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 19, 2012
Messages
9,446
Likes
11,884
#25
I would prefer they go back to 64 but it doesn't greatly bother me at 72. I would like the regular season and the standard to get get a little higher but so be it. I would also be concerned that this would just turn into 4 additional P5+BE schools getting in each year. That being said those teams would not be awful.

I think 96 is where I would throw up my arms and say this is too much.
 


3
Top Bottom