newmexicuse
All Conference
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 3,607
- Like
- 7,894
Very few expected Ty back, so therefore, very few expected us to have both Ty and Baz.
So the question becomes.... are we better off the way things played out or would we have been better off w Baz and no Ty ?
Ty brings a proven quantity to the table, albeit at a position of less need.
Baz, if appears to have a higher ceiling, how close could he have come to reaching that ceiling as a frosh ?
Assuming Baz was going to be a one and done, then we are only talking about one season in either situation.
As good as Baz was likely to be it might be a stretch to say he would have been good enough to offset Ty's 19 PPG, great D, and experience. Through Bras into the equation, and i think we are easily better off this way.
So the question becomes.... are we better off the way things played out or would we have been better off w Baz and no Ty ?
Ty brings a proven quantity to the table, albeit at a position of less need.
Baz, if appears to have a higher ceiling, how close could he have come to reaching that ceiling as a frosh ?
Assuming Baz was going to be a one and done, then we are only talking about one season in either situation.
As good as Baz was likely to be it might be a stretch to say he would have been good enough to offset Ty's 19 PPG, great D, and experience. Through Bras into the equation, and i think we are easily better off this way.