orangemass
All American
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 5,707
- Like
- 8,428
Classic meat head
Uno reverse card from Dino last yearEven worse, he didn't know distance. He thought it was 4th and 1. Your head coach doesn't know what's going on...
I think they were rushing the play because they didn’t want a review of the “catch” on third down. The catch may have not been overturned on review, but if it had been called incomplete on the field. It never would have been reversed on review. Personally, and I’ve watched it 6 times, I think he was out. But, hey it worked out for SU.Even worse, he didn't know distance. He thought it was 4th and 1. Your head coach doesn't know what's going on...
Yup. They rushed to the line to get that play off to limit the opportunity for a review. More than that, they marched down the field with relative ease and then rolled the diced thinking they could get the yards needed AND avoid a review. Hindsight is 20/20, but in the moment if I were a Purdue fan, I wouldn't have a problem with the chance that Brohm took there.I think they were rushing the play because they didn’t want a review of the “catch” on third down. The catch may have not been overturned on review, but if it had been called incomplete on the field. It never would have been reversed on review. Personally, and I’ve watched it 6 times, I think he was out. But, hey it worked out for SU.
Yup. Think calculus is either fourth and long with longer field goal or fourth and three. I would have done the same there.I think they were rushing the play because they didn’t want a review of the “catch” on third down. The catch may have not been overturned on review, but if it had been called incomplete on the field. It never would have been reversed on review. Personally, and I’ve watched it 6 times, I think he was out. But, hey it worked out for SU.View attachment 220118
I think they were rushing the play because they didn’t want a review of the “catch” on third down. The catch may have not been overturned on review, but if it had been called incomplete on the field. It never would have been reversed on review. Personally, and I’ve watched it 6 times, I think he was out. But, hey it worked out for SU.View attachment 220118
Yeah, if that's not out but Alford's was, I just don't understand how that works.I think they were rushing the play because they didn’t want a review of the “catch” on third down. The catch may have not been overturned on review, but if it had been called incomplete on the field. It never would have been reversed on review. Personally, and I’ve watched it 6 times, I think he was out. But, hey it worked out for SU.View attachment 220118
I would love to know what he was writing on those two pieces of paper. Every time they showed him he either was yelling at someone or writing on one of those pieces of paper.I knew nothing about Brohm until this week. He reminds of me of Frost in terms of being a smug jerk.
I think they were rushing the play because they didn’t want a review of the “catch” on third down. The catch may have not been overturned on review, but if it had been called incomplete on the field. It never would have been reversed on review. Personally, and I’ve watched it 6 times, I think he was out. But, hey it worked out for SU.View attachment 220118
On that last long TD from Jones, he had a subtle push on Williams. I thought Williams was getting into position to intercept the ball before the nudge.We need a WR with name recognition like Jones. He had a great day but also committed offensive PI more than once and obviously this. Because he's a know entity he gets the call every time, hopefully Gadsden's name shortly Garner's the same leeway
On that last long TD from Jones, he had a subtle push on Williams. I thought Williams was getting into position to intercept the ball before the nudge.
e
In fairness, before Jones transferred to Purdue there wasn't really much he'd done at Indiana to suggest he'd be this productive.We need a WR with name recognition like Jones. He had a great day but also committed offensive PI more than once and obviously this. Because he's a know entity he gets the call every time, hopefully Gadsden's name shortly Garner's the same leeway
In fairness, before Jones transferred to Purdue there wasn't really much he'd done at Indiana to suggest he'd be this productive.
He's basically our Amba.
YesI think they were rushing the play because they didn’t want a review of the “catch” on third down. The catch may have not been overturned on review, but if it had been called incomplete on the field. It never would have been reversed on review. Personally, and I’ve watched it 6 times, I think he was out. But, hey it worked out for SU.View attachment 220118
IowaIowa I think... And yeah but not to the same extent, he had 30ish catches as a frosh there
Correct but what do you expect from Ferentz meat head football, the only receivers they produce out of Iowa City are TEs who excel in the NFLIowa