Did ACA repeal die

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Forum' started by rrlbees, Jan 9, 2017.

  1. rrlbees

    rrlbees 2017 ESPN Tourney Challenge Winner Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    41,366
    Likes Received:
    37,712
    It's not weird to doctors and nurses. They will help anyone and they quite often do.
     
  2. Cusefan0307

    Cusefan0307 2017 Iggy Winner

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Messages:
    10,560
    Likes Received:
    15,930
    Why do we have police officers then?

    Oh I know why. To protect the privleged from the under privileged. Boom.
     
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2017
    KellySyracuse likes this.
  3. MiniCuse

    MiniCuse All Conference

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,832
    Likes Received:
    2,186
    - 10 for repeated spelling errors.
     
  4. SC Orange

    SC Orange Scout Team

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    689
    Have you considered the fact that rates are predicated on the cost of the care? And that the law did nothing to help clarify or control the cost of care? In my mind if we do have regulated rates for services or at minimum published rates we can actually control costs.
     
  5. Rage4CUSE

    Rage4CUSE Starter

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2015
    Messages:
    1,495
    Likes Received:
    1,289
    California and NYS population counts combined are a hair under 60,000,000.

    60 million out of 323 million is 19%. 2 states is almost a 5th of the entire nation.
     
  6. Hoo's That

    Hoo's That All Conference

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2013
    Messages:
    3,038
    Likes Received:
    3,400
    Yup. And we will have those published rates when we eventually go to Single Payer (aka "Medicare for Everyone").
     
  7. SC Orange

    SC Orange Scout Team

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    689
    Then there are no rates and none of this matters. If we go to a single payer system the positive of people having access to insurance will be outweighed by the myriad of negative economical consequences a single payer system would have.
     
  8. Cowtown

    Cowtown Adult Study Hall Overseer

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Messages:
    17,200
    Likes Received:
    21,626
    Single payer works where I live. It's not perfect, and there are problems. But it's hardly the pluperfect hell the HMO's and their Republican puppets want you to believe.
     
    Crusty likes this.
  9. SC Orange

    SC Orange Scout Team

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    689
    Let's imagine we went full national health care. Do the hospital systems become government property or are the just paid by the government? How can top surgeons and doctors continue to be paid exorbitant salaries? Can the funding for innovation still exist? Will we still be a world leader in new and emergent medical technology?

    I think if I had a written plan of how it would function then I can really dig into the idea. But the hurdles, in my opinion, seem too high to make that change. What about all of the people employed by the health insurance companies and the ancillary service/support companies. Shoot here in Charleston Benefitfocus is one of the largest employers. They are a employee benefit technology company that is publicly traded. What happens to all of those folks invested in companies like this?

    As you can see I really just want more information.
     
    OburgOrange likes this.
  10. Capt. Tuttle

    Capt. Tuttle Living Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2011
    Messages:
    12,166
    Likes Received:
    10,698
    Untrue. That's what Medicaid was for.
    They should have had a buy in for Medicaid for people who were barely over the income threshold, between X income and up to Y income.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2017
  11. Cowtown

    Cowtown Adult Study Hall Overseer

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Messages:
    17,200
    Likes Received:
    21,626
    Both systems are a "work in progress," imho. To develop a better HC system takes time, perseverance, and some patience. There is no single, sweeping panacea to either one. I get tired of the "Oh, but that will never work!" types who shoot down every new development or plan with their impatient sneering (I don't mean you).

    I still have not gotten an honest answer to the questions, "Why did the HMO's have hundreds of millions of dollars to pour into the battle against the ACA? And why did they fight so hard for so long?" And you can be certain there's no altruism in the answers. But then, they're really rhetorical questions, I guess. :)
     
    CuseFaninVT likes this.
  12. Hoo's That

    Hoo's That All Conference

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2013
    Messages:
    3,038
    Likes Received:
    3,400
    Everything depends on how you define "full national health care." If you're talking about single payer, think of it as "Medicare for everyone." The hospitals would still be owned and run by whoever owns and runs them now. The super-paid surgeons and doctors are going to either take a pay cut based on what expanded Medicare + Medigap insurance pays or charge their far fewer patients far more because they refuse to take anyone who will use expanded Medicare + Medigap to pay them. Those who invest in drug companies for "instant riches" are going to take a hit in their portfolio because the drug companies will have to plow a lot more of their profits back into their operations than into dividends (the first nail in the coffin of the UChicago "the company is your piggybank" model?). Medical technology originating in many parts of the world is originating in countries with true socialized medicine (hospitals owned and doctors employed by the government like the hospitals and doctors in our military and Public Health Service) or single-payer systems. The system we have is one of the outliers.

    And before you ask, yes, your taxes will go up because the government will have to take in more than the current 7% they get for Medicare. However, the market will drive health insurance costs down to a point at or very close to what Medigap insurance plans charge now. It will come very close to being a wash.
     
    Crusty, Toga and CuseFaninVT like this.
  13. SC Orange

    SC Orange Scout Team

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    689
    The answer to your question is simple, they were trying to protect profits so that their stock prices rise and investors are happy. The hundreds of millions spent on lobbying is less than the losses they have claimed from their plans offered on the exchange.
     
  14. xc84

    xc84 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2011
    Messages:
    9,644
    Likes Received:
    5,974
    And if the HMOs are seemingly losing... then who is benefiting?
     
  15. bozophobe

    bozophobe 2nd String

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages:
    819
    Likes Received:
    658
    Instead of Canada, we need to focus more on those systems in Europe that work well - guaranteed government coverage for all, but also access to private systems for those who want it.
     
  16. SC Orange

    SC Orange Scout Team

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    689
    Medical professionals and drug companies.
     
  17. Toga

    Toga Living Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    14,898
    Likes Received:
    26,130
    As a former health policy analyst, this is a good post. Health policy is a bit like whack a mole in that you push down on something here and something else will pop up over there. Very complex but generally I think a public option and the Feds being able to negotiate drug prices (criminal Congress prohibited) would go a long way to a better imperfect system.
     
    Crusty and Conrad13 like this.
  18. HOFCeluck

    HOFCeluck Living Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    10,312
    Likes Received:
    14,702
    Or, you'll just have fewer people go into medicine.
     
  19. Cowtown

    Cowtown Adult Study Hall Overseer

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Messages:
    17,200
    Likes Received:
    21,626
    I have difficulty believing the founders intended to build a place in which professional classes (doctors, lawyers, accountants) became obscenely wealthy in the backs of the sick and injured. The argument can be made that health care insurance has done for health care costs what student loans have done for education costs.
     
    KellySyracuse likes this.
  20. HOFCeluck

    HOFCeluck Living Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    10,312
    Likes Received:
    14,702
    What is "obscenely wealthy" to you, and what doctors do you know classify as that?

    Cause I know I'm not.
     
  21. exits funnel

    exits funnel All American

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,758
    Likes Received:
    2,827
    Yeah, doctors make good bank (and obviously it's all over the place depending on your specialty), but there aren't too many that I would describe as 'obscenely wealthy.'
     
  22. Cowtown

    Cowtown Adult Study Hall Overseer

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Messages:
    17,200
    Likes Received:
    21,626
    That wasn't a shot at you personally, nor my cousin who's an orthopedic surgeon, but this guy, with a net worth of over $10 million, who is now joining the other piggies at the trough, is not the only one like him.

    Dr. Ben Carson Net Worth 2015: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
     
  23. exits funnel

    exits funnel All American

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,758
    Likes Received:
    2,827
    The majority of Carson's wealth is derived from income not directly related to the practice of medicine (ie, book sales, fees / stocks related to boards he sits on)
     
    lincolncuse and HOFCeluck like this.
  24. HOFCeluck

    HOFCeluck Living Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    10,312
    Likes Received:
    14,702
    Yeah Ben Carson is like at the top of the food chain wrt neurosurgeons. He's definitely an outlier.
     
  25. Conrad13

    Conrad13 2nd String

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2013
    Messages:
    993
    Likes Received:
    2,928
    As a doctor, I'd love your take on how to pay for health care. Doctors who I know and in articles that I've read all complain about the crushing amount of paperwork involved with being a doctor and it seems like the ACA has only made it worse. What would you think of a single payer system where doctors are paid a salary rather than per procedure. It seem like this model could reduce unnecessary treatments and simplify paperwork for doctors. Doctors would be evaluated by their employer, and high performing doctors would get paid more. This system would raise taxes and create government bureaucracy so conservatives would hate it. It also could reduce economic incentives for pioneering doctors, which would be bad.

    **I don't have a political stance on health care and really just want something better than what we currently have.
     
    CuseFaninVT likes this.