Haven't heard this mentioned yet in regards to the T's | Syracusefan.com

Haven't heard this mentioned yet in regards to the T's

OburgCuse

2nd String
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
966
Like
1,080
This may have been discussed in another thread, but I've been on only a little bit today and haven't seen mentioned anywhere yet.

Does anybody know when the first T was called? Based on the TV I only saw the T when JB was obviously out in the middle of the court and that was the 2nd one that tossed him (unless they decided to give him 2 at same time). Lots of people including national media are getting on him about the tantrum and such but if they had already given him the initial T for saying bullshite or something the rest of it is a moot point and game over after 2 shots and the ball to Duke. Even Vitale and Bilas thought it was only one T that they saw initially and were a little surprised that he had been tossed. So I guess I'm just wondering if they gave him a quick T at end of game and that fueled him exploding (even though he hadn't mentioned that) and thus giving them his full mind.
 

orange79

Internet Sleuth
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
36,573
Like
102,245
I interpreted it as the first T and then the ejection signal was indicative of the second T. That's what I thought because I didn't see the first T (if there was one). :noidea:
 

OburgCuse

2nd String
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
966
Like
1,080
I interpreted it as the first T and then the ejection signal was indicative of the second T. That's what I thought because I didn't see the first T (if there was one). :noidea:

Yeah I wondered if this was the case and is probably correct otherwise I would have thought there would have been a bigger deal about it. If that was it then they were pretty close to each other, but I guess being out in the middle of the court does that to ya
 

Mareiniss

Starter
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
1,036
Like
2,349
Yeah I wondered if this was the case and is probably correct otherwise I would have thought there would have been a bigger deal about it. If that was it then they were pretty close to each other, but I guess being out in the middle of the court does that to ya

I wasn't counting the foul shots during the last few seconds of the game, but this article quotes C. J. Fair as saying that Duke made 3 of 4 free throws after the technical fouls were called. Here's my question -- if JB was called for two technical fouls, and C. J. was called for a charge, shouldn't Duke have gotten six free throws, rather than four?
 

Millhouse

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
26,854
Like
29,370
OburgCuse said:
This may have been discussed in another thread, but I've been on only a little bit today and haven't seen mentioned anywhere yet. Does anybody know when the first T was called? Based on the TV I only saw the T when JB was obviously out in the middle of the court and that was the 2nd one that tossed him (unless they decided to give him 2 at same time). Lots of people including national media are getting on him about the tantrum and such but if they had already given him the initial T for saying bullshite or something the rest of it is a moot point and game over after 2 shots and the ball to Duke. Even Vitale and Bilas thought it was only one T that they saw initially and were a little surprised that he had been tossed. So I guess I'm just wondering if they gave him a quick T at end of game and that fueled him exploding (even though he hadn't mentioned that) and thus giving them his full mind.
It was either the first second third or fourth BULLSHAT
 

jdubs30

Living Legend
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
14,317
Like
28,254
I wasn't counting the foul shots during the last few seconds of the game, but this article quotes C. J. Fair as saying that Duke made 3 of 4 free throws after the technical fouls were called. Here's my question -- if JB was called for two technical fouls, and C. J. was called for a charge, shouldn't Duke have gotten six free throws, rather than four?
Charges aren't FTs.

I think coming onto the floor like that is an automatic tech, but I'm not sure.
 

CusefanATL

2018 Iggy Post Season Record NCAA Winner
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
10,257
Like
11,349
I interpreted it as the first T and then the ejection signal was indicative of the second T. That's what I thought because I didn't see the first T (if there was one). :noidea:

No... In the Syracuse U highlights you see the 1st T and Matt Park makes reference of it.

It was quick IMO... but he didnt appear to be slowing down at that point... so he was getting it either way. I'll post link in a few.
 

Pat Kelly

2nd String
Joined
Sep 17, 2013
Messages
760
Like
589
I thought... technical was called due to incessant swearing/running onto the court... Boeheim argued more continued to swear because of technical, therefore, other technical/ejection was called.
 

CusefanATL

2018 Iggy Post Season Record NCAA Winner
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
10,257
Like
11,349
I thought... technical was called due to incessant swearing/running onto the court... Boeheim argued more continued to swear because of technical, therefore, other technical/ejection was called.

probably correct... but TV didn't show or make mention of the 1st tech. That was the OP's question/point.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
158,639
Messages
4,242,877
Members
5,571
Latest member
lspingler

Online statistics

Members online
173
Guests online
501
Total visitors
674




Top Bottom