Honest to goodness question about seeding... | Syracusefan.com

Honest to goodness question about seeding...

Lawrinson14

Master Image Editor
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
2,554
Like
8,250
Can someone please explain this to me? I just do not get how Syracuse is being equated with the following teams:

Syracuse:
27-4
Notable wins: Duke, UNC, Pitt x2, Nova,
Losses: @Duke, BC, @virginia (no grant), Ga Tech (no grant)

Kansas:
23-8
Notable wins: Duke, ISU x2, Texas, K-state
Losses: Nova, @Colorado, @FL, SDSU, @Texas, @KSU, @OK ST, @WVU (no Embiid)

Michigan:
23-7
Notable wins: Wisconsin, Iowa, MSU x 2, Ohio St
Losses: ISU, Charlotte, Duke, Arizona, @Indiana, IOWA, Wisconsin,

Villanova:
28-3
Notable wins: Kansas, Iowa
Losses: SU, Creighton x2

Virginia:
25-6
Notable wins: UNC, Syracuse
Losses: VCU, Wisconsin, @Green Bay, Tennessee, @Duke, @MD

Duke:
24-7
Notable wins: Mich, UVA, Syracuse, UNC, Pitt,
Losses: Kansas, Zona, @ND, Clemson, syracuse, @UNC, @WF


All have 2+ more losses besides Villanova, which only has 2 good wins. Also, they lost to Cuse by about 20 pts. And don't give me the RPI, SOS crap as the games not listed above were all basically against cannon fodder. What's really the difference between a team ranked 90 on the RPI and a team ranked 150? They both stink.
 

OttoinGrotto

2020-21 Iggy Award Winner 3 Point Shooting %
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
52,098
Like
139,819
See, this is why I feel confident that the selection committee can view our body of work favorably. Whether they choose to do so...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
160,490
Messages
4,341,638
Members
5,639
Latest member
GoldyGopher

Online statistics

Members online
54
Guests online
402
Total visitors
456




Top Bottom