Net Points, etc. - Virginia Tech II | Syracusefan.com

Net Points, etc. - Virginia Tech II

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,268
Like
62,385
I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of the non-conference season, the ACC season and the post season.

Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls)

Marek Dolezaj +21NP in 40 minutes = +247/610 = +16.2NP/40 for season
Buddy Boeheim +16NP in 40 minutes = +189/637 = +11.9NP/40 for season
Quincy Guerrier +13NP in 24 minutes = +92/320 = +11.5NP/40 for season
Elijah Hughes +12NP in 40 minutes = +314/681 = +18.4NP/40 for season
Bourama Sidibie +6NP in 16 minutes = +146/420 = +13.9NP/40 for season
Howard Washington +2NP in 16 minutes = +35/103 = +13.6NP/40 for season
Joe Girard +1NP in 24 minutes = +181/553 = +13.1NP/40 for season

DNP coach’s decision
Brycen Goodine 0NP in 0 minutes = +7/119 = +2.4NP/40 for season
Jesse Edwards 0NP in 0 minutes = +36/87 = +16.6NP/40 for season

Injured
Robert Braswell 0NP in 0 minutes = +13/48 = +10.8NP/40 for season
Jalen Carey 0NP in 0 minutes = -3/23 = -5.2NP/40 for season

Suspended
None

Redshirting
John Bol Ajak

Out for the year
None

Left Team
None


Awards

Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Buddy Boeheim 26 points and 2 assists = 28

Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus missed field goal and free throw attempts)
Buddy Boeheim 26 points – 10 mfg – 1 mft = +15

Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Marek Dolezaj 11 points of 16 = 68.75%

Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half?)
1st Half- Bourama Sidibie lay-up at 19:12 2nd Half- Marek Dolezaj lay-up at 19:14

TACO Bell MVP
(Who scored the point that got us to 70 points)
Elijah Hughes jumper at 0:58

My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Buddy Boeheim, Marek Dolezaj and Elijah Hughes 40 minutes


TEAM STATS

Possession

Rebounding
(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 5 of our 31 misses = 16.1%
They rebounded 7 of their 37 misses = 18.9%

Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 6 points on 5 O-Rebs = 1.200 points/O-Reb
They got 6 points on 7 O-Rebs = 0.857 points/O-Reb

Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 4 turnovers – 1 steals = 3 unforced
They had 7 turnovers – 6 steals = 1 unforced

Points per Takeover
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 13 points from 7 takeovers = 1.857 points/takeaway
They had 3 points from 4 takeovers = 0.750 points/takeaway

Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeover: [Second Chance Point s+ Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 19 points in 12 unsettled situations = 1.583 points
They had 9 points in 11 unsettled situations = 0.818 points

Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 35 + 7 = 42
They had 33 + 4 = 37

Hustle Stats
One of the radio sponsors gives an award to the team that had the most “hustle stats”, which they define as rebounds + steals + blocks. I decided to keep track of that, too:
We had 35 + 6 + 2 = 43
They had 33 + 1 + 1= 35

Scoring

Shooting
(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 23 for 36 on twos, (63.9%), 6 for 24 on threes (25.0%) and 7 for 10 on frees (70.0%)
They were 10 for 22 on twos, (45.5%), 15 for 37 on threes (40.5%) and 4 for 8 on frees (50.0%)
Combined percentages were: 1589 (639 + 250 + 700) vs. 1360 (455 + 405 + 500) = +229

Points
(PIP= points in the paint, “The Inner Sanctum”
POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP -free throws made
OL= points from “The Outer Limits” (three point shots)
TZ= “Twilight Zone”, which is POP – TREY, (two point jumpers from outside the paint)
FBP = fast break points
POTO= points off turnovers

We had 34 PIP, 30 POP, 18 OL, 12 TZ, 13 POTO, 6 FBP
They had 12 PIP, 53 POP, 45 OL, 8 TZ, 3 POTO, 2 FBP

Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 6 FBP in 38 opportunities (15.8%)
They scored 2 FBP in 28 opportunities (7.1%)

First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 52 FCP and 6 SCP
They had 57 FCP and 6 SCP

Starters/Bench
(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 64oints and our bench scored 7 points
Their starters scored 47 points and their bench scored 22 points

Assists
(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 10 of our 29 field goals = 34.5%
They assisted 22 of their 25 field goals = 88.0%

Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 71 points in 64 possessions = 1.109 points/ possession
They scored 69 points in 63 possessions = 1.095 points/possession
It was a 127 possession game.

If we just use FGA + (47.5% FTA) and thus count an offensive rebound as an additional possession and a turnover as a lost possession:
We scored 71 points in 65 possessions = 1.092 points/ possession
They scored 69 points in 63 possessions = 1.095 points/possession

Team Shooting Efficiency

(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)

We scored 71 points, missed 31 field goals and missed 3 free throws = net +37
They scored 69 points, missed 34 field goals and missed 4 free throws = net +31

(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)

We scored 71 on 36 two point attempts, 18 three point attempts and 12 free throw attempts = 71 of a possible 154 points = 46.1% of possible points scored.
They scored 69 on 31 two point attempts, 30 three point attempts and 8 free throw attempts = 69 of a possible 163 points = 42.3% of possible points scored.

Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)

19-19, 17-9, 17-23, 18-18

Fouls

(Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 36 two point shots, attempted 10 free throws and were fouled 14 times = 2.57; 0.71
They attempted 22 two point shots, attempted 8 free throws and were fouled 14 times = 1.57; 0.57
They were more likely to get calls when attempting two point shots but got more shots per foul.


Comments

- Marek Dolezaj has led in net Points three games in a row and in 6 of our last 10 games. He does it all.

- It was not a game for offensive rebounds. Only 12 of the two team’s 68 misses, (17.6%) were controlled by the shooting team. As a result both teams had just 6 second chance points.

- There were also minimal turnovers: 4 for us and 7 for them, so there were only 16 points after turnovers. But we got 13 of them.

- In 6 of our first 9 games we had a higher assist percentage than the other team. We also lost 5 of those 10 games. Since then we’ve lost it 6 of 7 games and are 5-2 in those games. Assists tend to come on jump shots because the shooter doesn’t take a step after he gets the ball. and a team too dependent on jump shots will usually lose. That’s why supplementing our attack with the dribble drive is important.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
167,131
Messages
4,681,916
Members
5,900
Latest member
DizzyNY

Online statistics

Members online
326
Guests online
2,329
Total visitors
2,655


Top Bottom