Townie72
All American
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 5,905
- Like
- 6,451
I am well aware that no WVU fan would ever admit that they would have been better off in the ACC.
"The Big 12 is a perfect place for WVU", they would no doubt tell anyone who would listen. Of course, they might express the opinion that they should have been picked by the SEC. but since that didn't happen, the Big12 is a great place.
WVU fans --- if any of them would have wanted to join the ACC -- have a legitimate bitch. The ACC changed the requirements for membership. When WVU might have been considered, WVU academics were just too bad for them to be considered. Then as things changed, the ACC found that UL's weren't.
I know there is residual sentiment about the ACC from WVU fans because their forum is non-stop jabbing at the ACC. If they really didn't care, there would be little of this.
WVU would have legitimate rivals in the new ACC including VT, Pitt and SU and schools like FSU and Clemson. Travel would have been much easier. AND they probably wouldn't be getting the stuffing beat out of them like they have this year by Texas Tech and Kansas State. Four Big12 teams have scored 55 or more points against WVU this year.
I have heard the argument that this year's WVU is a bad version. I don't buy it. WVU has had few down years in the past 10+. They are always good but never great. I think the future is going to hold a lot more of these whuppins.
A post from OrangeHeel or someone characterized South Carolina as "Too small to be a separate Country. Too large to be a mental institution". I don't know about South Carolina. But that description seems to also fit "Almost Heaven".
"The Big 12 is a perfect place for WVU", they would no doubt tell anyone who would listen. Of course, they might express the opinion that they should have been picked by the SEC. but since that didn't happen, the Big12 is a great place.
WVU fans --- if any of them would have wanted to join the ACC -- have a legitimate bitch. The ACC changed the requirements for membership. When WVU might have been considered, WVU academics were just too bad for them to be considered. Then as things changed, the ACC found that UL's weren't.
I know there is residual sentiment about the ACC from WVU fans because their forum is non-stop jabbing at the ACC. If they really didn't care, there would be little of this.
WVU would have legitimate rivals in the new ACC including VT, Pitt and SU and schools like FSU and Clemson. Travel would have been much easier. AND they probably wouldn't be getting the stuffing beat out of them like they have this year by Texas Tech and Kansas State. Four Big12 teams have scored 55 or more points against WVU this year.
I have heard the argument that this year's WVU is a bad version. I don't buy it. WVU has had few down years in the past 10+. They are always good but never great. I think the future is going to hold a lot more of these whuppins.
A post from OrangeHeel or someone characterized South Carolina as "Too small to be a separate Country. Too large to be a mental institution". I don't know about South Carolina. But that description seems to also fit "Almost Heaven".