2
20Plus
Guest
I asked him a few years ago about this exact topic and he was not in favor of it. I think it’s idiotic not to be in favor of it.
I asked him a few years ago about this exact topic and he was not in favor of it. I think it’s idiotic not to be in favor of it.
I’d imagine you went ahead and educated your friend Jim on the matter.I asked him a few years ago about this exact topic and he was not in favor of it. I think it’s idiotic not to be in favor of it.
Disagree there’s timeouts in the game that all enjoy if they challenge andthey’re wrong they lose a time out it should be close to a washIdiotic is probably a strong word. There is some legit reasons to be against it. One is they already review calls at the end of games. Two is it takes ridiculously long. Three is there is a level of fortuity in sports and subjectivity in all refereeing. While you may get one call against you, probability indicates you will get another in your favor. Four, it is difficult to decide what you can and cannot review. Take pass interference in the nfl for an example. An anaology for cbb is the block/charge calls, which admittedly I feel college refs are terrible at making and very inconsistent.
I realize there are counterarguments to all those points and I am not even taking a position on the issue, but simply stating that it may not be idiotic to be against coaches challenges.
Just peachy there pearl. A true peachI’d imagine you went ahead and educated your friend Jim on the matter.
Disagree there’s timeouts in the game that all enjoy if they challenge andthey’re wrong they lose a time out it should be close to a wash
Risk reward is obvious that’s why it needs to happen!