RF2044
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 30,570
- Like
- 98,385
Wait, so you're saying 18 yrs. v 17 yrs. is a more valuable determinant than the maturity of the individual? I'm pretty sure that since (a) BJ's grades are very much in order, (2) he's worked very hard to improve, gain weight, etc. and exhibits what sounds like exemplary off-season dedication, and (d) his Dad knows the drill and his parents / nuclear family are very stable and supportive... he'll be one of the more capable freshman on campus (not just the team) in terms of handling the manifold responsibilities that accompany college.
BJ's age concerns me not a whit, and I'm of the opinion that age isn't a material issue.
I agree about age. However, I do think that physical maturity is a big factor--and at the time he committed BJ was listed at 6-6 165 pounds. Doesn't mean that he hasn't improved that since last fall, but it would clearly be a factor in terms of his ability to contribute at the next level. Being "young" chronologically for his class might have something to do with it, but otherwise, I agree that age is just a number. If you can play, you can play.
Personally speaking, I think BJ is going to be a great player for us. Might not happen right off the bat, due to guys ahead of him on the depth chart / the aforementioned physical maturity limitation, but eventually he's going to be a stud. Wings with versatility / athleticism like BJ usually excel in our system.