To me the message is that we've had a lot of transition in our offense. The more consistency we can develop, the better the unit as a whole should perform. We've had 3 different starting qb's in 6 games with two of our best offensive players sidelined for several games. The line has been tweaked and is struggling to find their groove. The defense is going to give up points so the offense has to score. Quickly and frequently. Time for the offense to shine...
hunt could run inside back when we got defenders the hell out of the way. this year, no way. would've been a disaster.
Actually their biggest problem is themselves. They play conservatively on offense when they should be aggressive and try to grind out wins when college football has proven that only works when you have Alabama style talent. On defense they have no clue how to stop a team that can either both pass and run or runs a spread system with a running qb, which is basically all of college football these days other than LSU apparently.
Dungey has higher upside than Hunt, but Hunt would not make the mistakes that Dungey makes - perhaps 12 to 15 per game.
I've got to disagree here. I've seen both in multiple settings. Injuries aside, Syracuse has their best QB at the helm now.
That's what makes markets!
The idea of someone thinking the team could be better off with Hunt astounds me. I am amazed that people's perspectives can be so different. Dungey is the most exciting thing about Syracuse football for me right now.
Well, be astounded. First of all, the OP referred to the last two years and Dungey wasn't here last year. Secondly, it arguably would have been better for Dungey to RS. Maybe then, he might live to play four seasons.
If Dungey is as good this year as he will be in the future I doubt he would stay 4 more years.
Not necessarily true.
A QB needs to be able to pass in this offense. Not suitable for Hunt.
