“We recruit good players” was the quote.
What you are doing is attempting to reverse-engineer the criteria by looking at the results. It’s a wild-assed guess on your part.
Appears to me, that “good” players might excel in any or all of the categories you listed and many more.
Do you have any evidence that SU uses a set of ranked, weighted criteria in assessing players.
Or is that just your idea or the way you would do things in the unlikely event that you were a college coach?
Yeah, so you didn't directly answer any of the questions. Figured as much.