would SS have got that one more year

[upperdeck]

Huh? We were underdogs in every loss this season. Feel how you want but don't make up facts.

Btw, we were underdogs yesterday too.

what does that have to do with who was the better team on the field?

 

[Millhouse]

I think folks have gotten it wrong about the offense this year.

The offense was not the problem. The defense was the problem.

Yesterday, when we faced an inept offense - one our defense could handle - the offense was able to move the ball enough against a very good defense to win the game.

The Lester offense this year was interesting and at times pretty darn effective. We saw a lot of explosive plays on the ground and in the air. And it was all done with a true frosh QB and a walk-on sophomore QB. And it was done at times against pretty decent competition.

With time I have little doubt that Coach Lester would have developed something very special on the Hill.

So, in my view the problem was not the offense.

Both were terrible

 

[Bayside44]

And a fumble return TD on an incomplete pass.

That was a big factor I think.

It's not like that play took away a TD for us, impossible to know what happens if we just run a next play.

We needed to close that game out, go for the kill when we had our chance..

 

[wooddoc]

"If" is irrelevant.

 

[orangepassion]

I wonder when Shafer found out

 

[Louie and Bouie]

what does that have to do with who was the better team on the field?

By definition the underdog is the predicted losing team in the game on the field. Not sure what you mean.

 

[Scooch]

Huh? We were underdogs in every loss this season. Feel how you want but don't make up facts. Btw, we were underdogs yesterday too.

Yeah, we were home dogs in what arguably was the worst P5 matchup this season.

That alone might get some coaches fired.

 

[Louie and Bouie]

Yeah, we were home dogs in what arguably was the worst P5 matchup this season.

That alone might get some coaches fired.

Complaining about wins now? Interesting take.

We'll just have to wait and see how your next offensive guru does in that all important W column. He's got 3 years to get to 14. Good luck.

 

[orange79]

Complaining about wins now? Interesting take.

We'll just have to wait and see how your next offensive guru does in that all important W column. He's got 3 years to get to 14. Good luck.

Where was he complaining about wins?

 

[Scooch]

Complaining about wins now? Interesting take. We'll just have to wait and see how your next offensive guru does in that all important W column. He's got 3 years to get to 14. Good luck.

Who's complaining? You said we were underdogs. We were. That's terrible.

If the next hire is good he will easily win 14 in thee years.

I hope you are saying good luck to him as well. I assume you are more of an SU fan than a Scott Shafer fan.

 

[Scooch]

Where was he complaining about wins?

I hate wins. I'm a monster.

 

[Briancuse]

Complaining about wins now? Interesting take.

We'll just have to wait and see how your next offensive guru does in that all important W column. He's got 3 years to get to 14. Good luck.

He was just being realistic, we were life and death to beat a horrible BC team at home, and our other wins were against a 3-9 wake team, and awful fcs team, and an ot win against a 5 loss mac team.