Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Janner, post: 4991912, member: 739"]
I am not by any means saying the NET is a total garbage system of measurement, I actually think it has its merits. But there are clear issues, as I stated in my previous post, that run contrary to both  an accurate analysis and spirit of the game. If we keep the NET as it is i will guarantee at some point in the future there will be an ugly incident between teams that is the result of a coach telling his players to score more points because they need it to help their chances of making the NCAA tournament. That will be a problem and a bad look. I for one really like your idea of using an average of the RPI and the NET as the metric for the reasons you stated in the other thread because they help to offset each others weakness and reduces the reliance on margin of victory. And it would be very easy to implement. Both systems have been refined to a degree and the data/formula is being generated currently The work is already done, so to speak. Will it be perfect? No. But it gets us closer, which is what is important.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?