Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="BoomStickO, post: 114800"]
My gripe about the state of SU football has everything to do with the amount of money the school is willing to invest in it.

I see a lot of talk on this board about revamping the locker room and practice facilities.  Where is the school on this? It would seem to me that if SU seeks to remain relevant, despite the ACC move, it would treat the program like the first rate D-1 Program it should be.

I saw somewhere that SU has fallen to the bottom of the barrel for the amount of money invested into the players and program.  High School kids aren't stupid...  The school needs to subscribe a mandate for its commitment to the program by stepping up and making it happen.  Hell, with all the publicity such investments would make, wouldn't that alone garner more fan interest (let's not even talk about winning games)?  How about getting rid of the benches in the dome?  How's that for a commitment to football, not to mention basketball?

My point is that the school should show it will repay the fans and athletes of the team by showing a commitment to their experience and treating the program the right way.

It really ticks me off when I see the Clemson's willing to keep or bring in assistants at a salary of $1.3 million.  I guess that's what transpired this tirade.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?