2 former top 40 recruits at FF for 4 teams

[Cusefan0307]

Guy and Winston. That is it. I read all the time here we must have top 40 players to be good. Other schools are doing fine without them.

 

[HakAttack]

Guy and Winston. That is it. I read all the time here we must have top 40 players to be good. Other schools are doing fine without them.

Correlation does not imply causation.

 

[Cusefan0307]

Correlation does not imply causation.

If we aren't going to compete for top 40 guys we need to start developing a veteran team with players in their correct positions like Virginia and Michigan State.

 

[Pearl309]

What a bunch of losers

 

[HakAttack]

If we aren't going to compete for top 40 guys we need to start developing a veteran team with players in their correct positions like Virginia and Michigan State.

Which is completely different than the point you made initially, and somewhat undermines the point you were trying to make. It's fine if you don't have top 40 players as long as you have a system that's well-defined and successful, neither of which we have.

So your point about not needing top 40 players to win is somewhat irrelevant here, as we don't have a good offensive system in place, and haven't had for quite some time.

 

[Cusefan0307]

Which is completely different than the point you made initially, and somewhat undermines the point you were trying to make. It's fine if you don't have top 40 players as long as you have a system that's well-defined and successful, neither of which we have.

So your point about not needing top 40 players to win is somewhat irrelevant here, as we don't have a good offensive system in place, and haven't had for quite some time.

Auburn and Sparty run a lot of pick and roll just like us. The difference is they have competent guards and can push pace.

 

[Ggaenzle]

Nick ward?

 

[Cusefan0307]

Nick ward?

Nope. Outside the top 40.