Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Knicks411, post: 2465949, member: 767"] Part of that is because he was hurt and inconsistent. He had a 3-4 year run in the middle of his career where he was either not that great or not available. That's not the end of the world, but I don't think you can ignore it. Might be why I take Moose over him. I may have brought this up before, I wonder if the strike/lockout in 94 and 95 hurt Moose as much as anyone. In 94 he was 16-6, he won 16 of his 24 starts. the strike cost the last 50ish games of the year, probably cost him close to 10 starts. Does he get to 20 wins that year? 95, 144 game season, he was 19-9, with the extra 3-4 starts, does he get to 20 there? All of a sudden he's sitting with 275 wins and 3 20 win seasons; I think his case looks a little different to the average voter at that point. Schilling does have the peak though. So i get the argument for him. [/QUOTE]