Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jr4750, post: 2029172, member: 117"] I agree with you. I was trying not to engage deeply in that particular conversation, but, offer that I always thought having alums as recruiters was a bonus. Now it's very possible that those particular alums could be less talented than someone else, which is totally fair. I would want the best possible candidate regardless of their background. I was also trying to say that I thought GMAC had all the intangibles to be a good recruiter, and that hopefully, the Quade experience taught him a few things. I totally get that he isn't as good as Hop and Red at it, at this point, and very much hope that the coaches realize the situation is getting dire and there is no time to acclimate a young inexperienced coach. That said, I never understood why recruiting wasn't a all hands on deck practice. Cuse goes after 5-10 kids max a cycle. I would want all my assistants to be involved with the top guys. Why would that be bad. [/QUOTE]