Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 3240183, member: 622"] Assuming that the hires are what you say they are and not as SUTomCat as analyzed: How does your theory match up against the Big 10 East? Describe other schools where this approach was successful? Assuming the plan works, how does Rutgers keep up the shell game? They have run in the red for decades, they loose at least $25MM/annually and though they may be making more in the B1G, they certainly have failed to improve facilities, programs and overall competitiveness. Do the NJ taxpayers ever get refunded bu Rutgers? Do the Rutgers students ever get the AD program off the Student fees dole? Does the Rutgers General Fund and Bank ever get to stop lending to the AD? Does Rutgers ever run in the black without any of the above? Schiano may have had a good idea, but he is certainly overpaying for this staff. Even if they are worth it five years from now, this staff as a whole is not a P5 staff. [/QUOTE]