Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 2994854, member: 1969"] There was plenty of comments about the great leaderboard yesterday, how there was 5 major champions tied for first , and they were asking when was the last time the top 5 were all major winners. After yesterday it was a historically great leaderboard heading into the weekend (and Tiger helped it of course. The Masters leaderboard is typically stronger (name wise) because they don't have the depth of field that the other majors have to get outsiders hanging around. I have also noted that "harder" majors tend to have weaker leaderboards -- logically its the opposite of what is expected. [/QUOTE]