Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Alsacs, post: 3261155, member: 652"]
The Super Bowl  MVP argument isn’t his best argument.
I mean sorry the voting is just slanted to the position.
Tom Brady wasn’t the MVP of SB 36.
It should have been Ty Law. His pick 6 turned that game and the Patriots D out physicaled the Rams offense.

Brady led the last second drive and won the MVP.
He earned the MVP in SBs 38, 49, 51.

Eli Manning wasn’t the most valuable player of SB 42. He won the award but again that was Qb bias. The team scored 17 points. You guys won because your defense held the best offense in NFL history at that point to 14 points.

The voting is just dumb. Justin Tuck and Michael Stranhan were why the Giants won that game. They destroyed the Patriots OL and were the Pats only scored 14 points. Eli won the award because voters are bias just like Brady won the MVP in his first SB.

The second Super Bowl I am not going to argue. The Giants defense played well again holding the Patriots to 17 points but Eli did enough play well enough to earn that MVP.

The first one though just because QBs get the award so much doesn’t make him a HOFer.

If the hall of fame is about the best of the best then he doesn’t belong in it. He wasn’t one of the best QBs of this era.

Eli Manning’s best stat was he never missed a start in 16 years due to injury.
He got benched 1 week but was always available.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?