Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 3312104, member: 1969"] So what were the main reasons he picked Nicklaus, because there are good reasons for both. I hope it doesn't focus to much on the typical stuff - top 5 finishes and his "better" competitors which are really just functions of depth. That being said the top line depth in golf in Tiger's second half of his golden era (2005-2009) was pretty weak as well. Just look at some of the major champions from about 2005-2012. I think the one thing that can't be debated is who was the best at his peak. To me there is no debate that Tiger in 2000-2001 was the best golfer that ever played the game. But the best ever has to consider career, and also what that player has given to the game and how they have represented the game. [/QUOTE]