Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SUskibum, post: 3708635, member: 149"] I think it’s a choice between minimizing gains (bend but don’t break) with a clogger, and maximizing TFL opportunities with a disrupter. I prefer the latter and the only defensive success we have had over the past 20 years is when we had a disruptive penetrating, attacking defense under DCSS. Now, the optimal choice is having a 6-5 320 athletic freak like A Donald or most SEC tackles but we have to make a choice. You can clog or you can disrupt but you can’t do both. I for one, am ready for a change... EDIT: btw this isn’t my opinion about the choice, as I have heard Dino and WHite (and other aztec disciples) talk directly about prioritzing athleticism over size at DT. However they then prioritize size at the LB and safety levels which recognizes the increased responsibility those positions have in stopping the run due to the lack of the pluggers at DT. [/QUOTE]