Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="upperdeck, post: 4454695, member: 474"] Kent would be a fine choice.. Great numbers as a 2nd baseman. I would also say most casual fans never really paid attention to how well he hit the ball And some of these guys have good numbers but they just didnt ring the bell like a HOF. Stats vs perception I guess. like if you hit 30 Hrs for 20 yrs you are a decent HR hitter but not an elite guy and suddenly you look up and they are at 600. its a debate as well, does 4-6 yrs of really high level and 15 yrs of ehh make you better than 20 yrs of pretty good. I dont know which is harder to be really good for a chunk or good enough for a long time. [/QUOTE]