Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off-Topic
Other Sports
2024-25 NHL THREAD.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 5309144, member: 1969"] I don't see it as a torch being passed. But more like Canada does not hold the torch anymore, and its just balanced, where tournaments like this are determined by coaching, selection, chemistry, execution, discipline etc. The US team has a good mix and chemistry right now. Not sure if part of that is familiarity through their development program. This current Canadian batch is lacking something even though their draft status is higher than the US. Canada has more talent in terms of players under-20. (in fact the gap in numbers in first rounders was closer at times in 2010's where the US didn't do that well) - Canada had 23 first round picks age eligible for this tournament. The USA had 8. That gap was actually larger than it has been in past years. Yet the teams that were iced by the US showed more skill in my view. Part of it is player type, but I think a bigger issue is I have no clue what the Team Canada selection committee was doing. They were too cute in overlooking skill. By passed the leading scorer in the OHL (Misa), the best scorer in the WHL (Cristall) the top 2 D picked in the last draft from North America who are highly skilled. - If it was a pure under-20 tournament, truly best on best, I think Canada would have likely won. Add Bedard, Celebrini, and Zach Benson to Canada. Add Will Smith to the US. Adding the clearly two best players in the world under 20 to Canada probably would have made up for the lack of competency Canada showed in many areas. On to the next point ... - - That being said It just goes to show that if Canada has poor team selection, poor coaching, bad discipline / poor system execution, it has very little chance to win In the past it could pull it off because the talent gap was even larger. There was always the false narrative in Canada that we won because "we had more heart". We had clearly the most talent back then, its not more heart. - Things are fairly closely balanced right now, that even if Canada has good coaching, player execution, it can still lose to a country like the US. Its not going to get away with it when they do a mixed job. There was actually years in the 2010's where the US had more first round picks eligible for the tournament than now and they struggled. Chemistry matters, coaching matters, when the balance is not too far off between teams. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Off-Topic
Other Sports
2024-25 NHL THREAD.
Top
Bottom