Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="CA Monk, post: 5453391, member: 5268"]
I originally placed this post in its own thread entitled "[B]Meanwhile, Back in 1952...BC[/B]," but the mods moved it here so it appears I was piggybacking on this serious charge. Nope. Rape is intolerable.

However sex is irresistible (mostly) and I find it humorously archaic that it is sequestered and prohibited just when you're awash in its potent triggers. I mean I've heard that sex is a [I]nice [/I]thing that can be shared and enjoyed rather than repressed and forbidden. Institutions can do as they like within the law, i just think this honor code is laugh out loud (snicker out loud at least) moralizing and I'm sure there are many coeds who flout this Victorian/religious restriction. BTW, if you feel differently that's fine. Whatever works for you.  
. 
I didn't include the rape allegation because, irrespective of the circumstance, Mr. Retzlaff still would've been compelled to separate or suffer a penalty from the university for bumping uglies. Seems ludicrous and anachronistic under that circumstances (discovered to have had consensual sex).

We're a long way from SU Football fandom here.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?