Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Consigliere, post: 4932343, member: 559"] You honestly don't have all the relevant information, nor do you understand the critical decision making that has gone in the process. Buy me a beer sometime and we can chat. I have some real issues with the finalized process, but it is much superior to the original plan. Longevity is factored in, but is not the primary sort criterion that some would like. The Donor Rank process is really pretty solid for annual type benefits like parking and post season ticket priority but is problematic for several reasons when applied as designed for perennial benefits like renewable seat locations. There are fewer seats, particularly in the lower bowl and some people will be disproportionately inconvenienced so that all can benefit, but expectation is the football impact will be much less severe than many are fearing. [/QUOTE]