Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 5378354, member: 1969"] I think the results part hasn't changed too much from the past. UNC has a very unique resume this year. 1-12 vs Q1, which is ugly 8-0 vs Q2, which is great That being said the "SOS" of UNC's Q1 games by themselves was ridiculously difficult 10 of the 13 games were "top half" difficulty, and 7 were extremely high difficulty - 7 of the 13 games are against teams that will be seeded #1 or #2, and the 2 that were at home were against Duke and Alabama. - Of the other 6 games, NONE were at HOME. - UNC only had 2 of its 13 Q1 games at home (Duke and Alabama) Could they, should they have went 2-11 or 3-10 sure. The losses at Pitt and Wake Forest hurt. But I'm not sure any bubble team is likely to go more than 3-10 against that slate of teams. Things go right maybe 4-9. But then again those teams didn't go 8-0 in Q2 games like UNC. [/QUOTE]