Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 5378581, member: 1969"] Strongly leaning towards Texas at this point, and its not just because of the SEC factor. Those other 3 contenders lack the quality wins.. well Indiana some but 4-13 vs 7-10. Just at a high level quad look, with no scrubbing, Team/ Q1/ Q1+Q2/ Bad Losses Texas 7-10/ 10-15 /0 Indiana 4-13/ 9-13/0 Xavier 1-9 / 10-11 / 0 UNC 1-12 / 9-12 / 1 bad loss Q2 Texas is really bad compared to others 3-5, 5-0, 8-2, 8-0. That is their big wart on their resume. So then we need to add Q1+Q2 to see if big difference in my mind. If you add Q1+Q2, Texas, Indiana and UNC all have similar winning % (40%, 41%, 43%), but to break that tie you have to go to the one who did best in the highest quality. Xavier is the only with a clear big lead in Q1+Q2 (48% vs 40%), but against its just 1 Q1 win... or at best 3 if you want to slide in home wins against UConn and Creighton based on scrubbing the sides of the quads. [/QUOTE]