Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="wgdsr, post: 5142331, member: 7179"] meh. i like my rationale just fine. duke lost in the quarters to your terps, btw. so duke lost in quarters, loses a ton, and gets placed nearby. umd lost a ton, gets placed nearby (they may have been 1 or 2?). all-americans is a proxy, not that good of one usually, me i'd look at all their losses in their 15-20. they had lost about 70%? of scoring. the also not-talked-about enough reason for that team was their shorties, and didn't they lose basically all 4-5 of them? to the pros? young guys, schmoung guys. duke has young guys, they all do. maltz (who'd done it before), malever, murphy and long were what represented the proven commodities on offense. they did also have geppert back, losing rahill at close. just a ton of guys gone, though. plus their offensive coordinator, who finally got the team scoring more than 12 a game. all that said, i hope dook implodes. [/QUOTE]