General20
Basketball Maven
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 1,770
- Like
- 12,019
I happened to have two charity events scheduled during SU's two games in MSG, and last night I had guests over the house during the game. I got to watch all these games, but not carefully. I mostly had people talking to me while I was watching and I was not able to pay close enough attention to really break any of them down in a meaningful way. I do have a few predictions for the future that may be interesting though.
Prediction number one - Kaleb Joseph will have a better year than Chris McCullough. Joseph is not very good right now, and McCullough looks like a star. McCullough is, and will continue to be, the most talented player on the team, but when conference play starts the games are going to get a lot more physical and McCullough is going to wear down a bit. I am expecting McCullough to start the season strong, but hit a wall at some point. Hopefully, he can push through that wall and find his legs again at the end of the season the way Donte Greene did for us after he hit his mid-season wall. If you were to graph McCullough's production for the year, expect to see peaks and valleys. Joseph has all the tools necessary to be a star, even though right now he's not using those tools correctly. This young SU team started the season lost on both offense and defense, and you know Boeheim, he is fixing the defense first. There are signs the D is coming around, but meanwhile Joseph is not going to look very comfortable, or very good, offensively. With time this will change. Obviously everybody has better games and worse games, but if you were to graph Joseph's production for the season, expect to see it consistently rise. I think most people will look favorably on the way Joseph's graph looks when its all said and done.
Prediction number two - It dosn't matter how well Cooney shoots. The two MSG games were the first SU games this year I watched with crowds of people, and it amazed me how many of them brought Cooney's name up every play. Some ridiculed him, others defended him, but everyone seemed to be obsessed with him. I know that's the case on this board, but I was surprised at just how far reaching this Cooney obsession is. Most of the Cooney obsession that I heard went something like this: "Cooney needs to shoot x% from three this year for Syracuse to be good, and if he falls short of that percentage, I'm going to be mad!" Obviously I'm paraphrasing, but that's the general idea. I never heard anybody ask WHY Cooney is shooting the percentage he is shooting. The answer is very simple. Defenses are making it a point to stop him. I feel the need to make an additional very simple point here, Trevor Cooney is not Steph Curry or Kobe Bryant. He is not going to be able to create a lot of points if the defense is focused on shutting him down. When other teams want to shut down Cooney, they are going to succeed 9 times out of 10. The good news is, if they truly commit to never giving Cooney open looks, then it will make things easier for the rest of our players to score. Its the rest of our players that need to make team's pay, and if they do than those teams will stop focusing on Cooney and his shooting percentage will go up. Its really not on Cooney at all. Its on the rest of our guys. If Cooney needs to carry us, then we are not going to be good, its as simple as that, and to me that is not a knock on Cooney, he is suppose to be a shooter, which is by definition a role player or complimentary piece. Plus, 2 point field goal percentage is the most meaningful stat in any basketball game. If opposing teams are worrying about stopping us from three then that is to our advantage. The key to the season will be our guys ability to exploit the openings they get inside the three point arc.
Prediction number three - It does not matter how much BJ Johnson and Ron Patterson play (or don't play) this year. Nothing can be done to bring them up to the level we need them to play at. When you have the body to play high level D1 basketball and the skill (as McCullough and Joseph do) then playing time can help you. It will help you adjust to the speed of the game, and help coaches point out the things you need to work on. But when you don't have the body to play high level D1 basketball (as Johnson does not . . . he's simply too skinny) or when you don't have the skill (as its becoming more and more apparent that Patterson does not) ten or twenty minutes of PT a game can't help you. Basketball is hard. It takes thousands of hours of practice to improve your skills and thousands of hours in the gym to improve your body, a few minutes in a game won't make a difference. That is why the biggest jumps in play always happen during the off season.
So those are my predictions. All of which, I think, are rather bold. Lets see if any come true.
Prediction number one - Kaleb Joseph will have a better year than Chris McCullough. Joseph is not very good right now, and McCullough looks like a star. McCullough is, and will continue to be, the most talented player on the team, but when conference play starts the games are going to get a lot more physical and McCullough is going to wear down a bit. I am expecting McCullough to start the season strong, but hit a wall at some point. Hopefully, he can push through that wall and find his legs again at the end of the season the way Donte Greene did for us after he hit his mid-season wall. If you were to graph McCullough's production for the year, expect to see peaks and valleys. Joseph has all the tools necessary to be a star, even though right now he's not using those tools correctly. This young SU team started the season lost on both offense and defense, and you know Boeheim, he is fixing the defense first. There are signs the D is coming around, but meanwhile Joseph is not going to look very comfortable, or very good, offensively. With time this will change. Obviously everybody has better games and worse games, but if you were to graph Joseph's production for the season, expect to see it consistently rise. I think most people will look favorably on the way Joseph's graph looks when its all said and done.
Prediction number two - It dosn't matter how well Cooney shoots. The two MSG games were the first SU games this year I watched with crowds of people, and it amazed me how many of them brought Cooney's name up every play. Some ridiculed him, others defended him, but everyone seemed to be obsessed with him. I know that's the case on this board, but I was surprised at just how far reaching this Cooney obsession is. Most of the Cooney obsession that I heard went something like this: "Cooney needs to shoot x% from three this year for Syracuse to be good, and if he falls short of that percentage, I'm going to be mad!" Obviously I'm paraphrasing, but that's the general idea. I never heard anybody ask WHY Cooney is shooting the percentage he is shooting. The answer is very simple. Defenses are making it a point to stop him. I feel the need to make an additional very simple point here, Trevor Cooney is not Steph Curry or Kobe Bryant. He is not going to be able to create a lot of points if the defense is focused on shutting him down. When other teams want to shut down Cooney, they are going to succeed 9 times out of 10. The good news is, if they truly commit to never giving Cooney open looks, then it will make things easier for the rest of our players to score. Its the rest of our players that need to make team's pay, and if they do than those teams will stop focusing on Cooney and his shooting percentage will go up. Its really not on Cooney at all. Its on the rest of our guys. If Cooney needs to carry us, then we are not going to be good, its as simple as that, and to me that is not a knock on Cooney, he is suppose to be a shooter, which is by definition a role player or complimentary piece. Plus, 2 point field goal percentage is the most meaningful stat in any basketball game. If opposing teams are worrying about stopping us from three then that is to our advantage. The key to the season will be our guys ability to exploit the openings they get inside the three point arc.
Prediction number three - It does not matter how much BJ Johnson and Ron Patterson play (or don't play) this year. Nothing can be done to bring them up to the level we need them to play at. When you have the body to play high level D1 basketball and the skill (as McCullough and Joseph do) then playing time can help you. It will help you adjust to the speed of the game, and help coaches point out the things you need to work on. But when you don't have the body to play high level D1 basketball (as Johnson does not . . . he's simply too skinny) or when you don't have the skill (as its becoming more and more apparent that Patterson does not) ten or twenty minutes of PT a game can't help you. Basketball is hard. It takes thousands of hours of practice to improve your skills and thousands of hours in the gym to improve your body, a few minutes in a game won't make a difference. That is why the biggest jumps in play always happen during the off season.
So those are my predictions. All of which, I think, are rather bold. Lets see if any come true.