Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Brooky03, post: 5728527, member: 8594"] I think the problem is the inconstant application of logic. BH, for example, was propped up for turning around 2 programs in 3 years. Gerry turned around 1 program in 2 years. They’re each 0-1 in the tournament. We’re supposed to act like Gerry’s was a fluke or not really that impressive while BH’s was ‘omg this dude’s incredible.’ BH runs a cool offense; he recruited well for Oats (who didn’t have trouble landing guys after BH left). Schertz turned us down. The school looked at outside hires sincerely. For different reasons, Gerry ended up working out. The idea that he wasn’t a viable candidate to begin with is what I take issue with. NIL matters a lot. If donors were willing to write bigger checks for Gerry because they remember his days at SU fondly, that goes at the top of his resume. That’s not something that can be dismissed. [/QUOTE]