Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="CardiacCuse, post: 4074962, member: 6979"]
the 1-3-1 was really good...not sure what happened to go away from bc as soon as they went back to the 2-3...Indiana made like 10 shots [I]in a row.[/I]

I think they have to come up with some more wrinkles...definitely keep the 1-3-1 in rotation. or the 1-1-3 or whatver it was...

with the height this team has...there should be something better defensively.

if youre gonna let buddy iso...might as well go ----buddy-symir-benny-frank-jesse-----during that time.

but the second half feels ilike pre-planned stuff...how come the team usually does better in the first half when the whole rotation is being used but then gets torched in the 2nd when its mostly just the starters?

another trend is opponents getting career highs - kopp got his [I][B]career high[/B] vs this defense[B]. he looked like larry bird[/B][/I]

i think it is important to realize that there is a correlation here - its not just bad luck or an accident! the scheme is allowing these players to go off!!!!

switch it up!

with the height advantage at almost every position - defense should be at least not a weakness.

overall, the goal for the defense should be to not give up WIDE OPEN SHOTS...the zone should be making teams make harder contested shots - not dunks and wide open 3 as it is.

what other schemes might work? i dont think the 2-3 will...though they are getting [I]slightly better[/I] it seems.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?