Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
8-5 rest of the way gets us in
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 2032803, member: 1969"] Just looking at the bubble teams from last year and the P-12 at large teams and what they accomplished on the road, as this could be a wart for us. The reason I bring up the Pac-12 teams is because they had depth in the top 60 last year as well, but not the elite. [B] Regarding our discussion of needing quality road wins -- look at Oregon St below who built there entire resume beating P-12 teams at home in conference. For that reason I remember thinking they should be on the bubble, but they were not even really considered.[/B] The only slight issue with the RPI's below are that they moved slightly as they are post tourney numbers from the site I am getting them from. But given that most of these teams were one and out they did not move much) [B]Tulsa[/B] (RPI around 70) - 6 road wins. [B]1 good road win (#14 SMU). [/B] Beyond that they had 4 top 50 wins (but other than that SMU win only 1 against a top 8 seed), 3 bad losses, and were the major surprise to get in. [B]Vanderbilt [/B](RPI around 70) - 3 road wins, [B](best road win at Florida, RPI #45 but an NIT Team).[/B] They also had 2 neutral wins against sub 150 teams. They had 4 top 50 wins (2 at home against Top 25 teams, and beat Florida twice an NIT Team). They also had 3 bad losses. It stuns me how Lunardi thought this was a reasonable selection but not us. And now a few of the Fake 12 teams from last year. This is the impact of a conference with good RPI mates. USC (RPI Around 60) - 8 seed, with [B]3 road wins but none of quality (best one was #99 RPI), 2 neutral wins (1 quality vs an 11 seed in Wichita St). [/B] They had 5 top 50 wins (all at home except for a win over an 11 seed on a neutral court). They only had one bad loss. But this was a #8 seed. [B] Oregon (RPI Around 50). 18-12 record, a 7 seed!! They won 4 road games, and 1 neutral game. None of the wins were of any quality (highest was #87 RPI Stanford). Their entire resume was beating Oregon, Utah, Cal, Colorado, and USC at home. (That is 2 top 25 wins, 2 other top 50 wins, and one win against a sub 50 tourney team in USC). They also had 2 sub 100 RPI losses, although nothing as bad as St. John's or BC. [/B] Pac 12 teams last year proved you could largely build a resume at home if your conference is numerically good enough,. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
8-5 rest of the way gets us in
Top
Bottom