Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="chugg21, post: 3927454, member: 3360"] I get it. I imagine that the dudes at the scouting sites can somewhat differentiate the top 50 or so kids at a position. Once they are trying to differentiate #60 from #90 they are likely just going by specific traits or something else where they are splitting hairs. While Wisconsin's top guys are definitely of a higher quality both in rating and by what we see on the field on a yearly basis, the whole system seems to now be like a lot of things with todays youth and kind of made to not hurt anyone's feelings so it turns into Oprah and you get 3 stars and you get 3 stars... [/QUOTE]