Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
A tale of two basketball programs (aka, a study in contrasts)
az.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="RF2044, post: 5368082, member: 40"] There's a lot of truth to what you post. Syracuse and the administration need to decide -- quickly -- what type of program they want to have moving forward. Because the way the last coaching change was made isn't going to cut it in P4 basketball. We are literally one of the WORST teams in the major conferences [as evidenced by abysmal KenPom and NET ratings]. Our rotations make no sense. Our players don't improve -- they regress. We can't play defense to save our lives. All indicative of poor coaching. This isn't going to cut it. SU needs to decide if we want to be BC or a team challenging for top 4 in the conference every year. The approach needs to follow suit, just as it did for Arizona. They bounced back QUICKLY even after a major scandal, because they hired a coach / staff who [while more unproven that I'd like to see for OUR situation] knew what they are doing. Beyond a handful of posters, I doubt that anyone sees our staff in the same light. And for the record, this is a really down year for the ACC -- a year where we should have [U]accidentally[/U] gotten to 20 wins. On top of that, we had a favorable schedule that was heavily loaded with the bottom teams in the conference. Even so, we posted a terrible record, and couldn't beat anybody [we might have gotten 1 win] above us in the conference standings, which is damning given how down the ACC outside of 2 or 3 teams. Anyone who watches college basketball outside of just our games can see the difference. Teams at all levels play hard, get after it defensively, and have a structured offensive concept that their players execute properly. Not us. In 10 years, we've gone from being ranked #1, to not even being ranked in the top 25 for years on end, to being a marginal bubble team, to not even being an NCAA qualifying team for an extended period of years, to being one of the worst teams in major conference P4 basketball. Sad, really. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
A tale of two basketball programs (aka, a study in contrasts)
Top
Bottom