SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 32,700
- Like
- 62,973
Coach Shafer has made a point, both in his news conference and on his radio show that if the other team jumps out to a lead we are at a disadvantage because we have to go to the pass and we don't do that well. But is that really true? Is this team better off going to the pass when behind? I realize it's conventional wisdom that when you are behind you have to score quickly and the pass is the only way to do that. But if you aren't good at it, it's not a way to score at all. All through the Georgia Tech game I felt that even as the score mounted against us, we were better off running the ball. It's what we do best. it would set up some passing plays. It would take time off the clock and thus hold the score down, (which became the real issue after a while). It would give the defense some rest against those long, grinding Tech drives. And, if we could score with it, we could mount some semblance of a comeback and maybe even get the game turned around before it was too late.
I just don't see the point of abandoning your game plan if it's what you do best.
I just don't see the point of abandoning your game plan if it's what you do best.