Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jr4750, post: 794775, member: 117"] I apologize to start a new thread as I know there are already many floating around, but I didn't want my question to get buried. In terms of the argument regarding adding sports like baseball and hockey, what is the differential for payouts between sports? Is there a breakdown? FSU has way more organized sports teams than us and all I've seen is that each ACC school gets equal revenue. How can that be, there's gotta be increased take in for fielding competitive and marketable teams. As of 2015 only 5 ACC schools will have men's lax teams however that sport is easily a top 5 asset for the conference. Is this wrong? Are the payouts, minus bowls and championship advancement all equal? And if true, why would we look to add expenses or sports we couldn't logically compete in, simply to field them? Can anyone briefly assist me on this? Thanks! [/QUOTE]