Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Alsacs, post: 1170739, member: 652"] LOL, not many as I typically am writing on my phone waiting to meet with somebody. I just have a position I wish people could respect and agree to disagree instead of people trying to defend a bad deal. If I make a bad deal I would own it and just admit it take the lumps and move on. I wouldn't try to justify it if I knew it was bad. People here want to make a bad deal look good when its just a midmajor type deal. I get the OXtreme argument we needed the money so we did. That argument kinda admits its a bad deal done for monetary reasons. I can accept that and move on, but when others want to make this bad deal actually look like a good deal I lose it. I respect the Kaiser wing argument of wanting NYC games for branding purposes but I would never agree to deal where SU plays home games at Metlife and then road games at the opponent's stadium. Especially if Syracuse can't fill Metlife up on its own with 75% of the crowd. [/QUOTE]