Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="longtimefan, post: 3935656, member: 212"] I'm suggesting that if the reports and conjecture are correct then USC may not be an available opponent. 9 league games + 1 ACC + 1 B1G = 11. Leaving one opening. If ND isn't considered ACC, they would be the 12th. If they are, USC can argue that the ND game takes care of their ACC obligation. And the number "41" was mentioned several times yesterday, indicating that for purposes of the alliance, ND is ACC. And if 41 is the number of schools pledged to this alliance, wouldn't that indicate that Swarbrick was involved in the Phillips-Warren-Kliavkoff discussions? [/QUOTE]