Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 3936045, member: 622"]
I agree that USC/ND is most likely to be played annually.  Your assumption otherwise is your mistake.  I have not stated otherwise, for you to reach your conclusion you have to read far more into my posts than exists.

I disagree that there is no solution to accommodating this game.  I pointed out that you inadvertently provided a solution.  However, you still insist that the ACC will be shafted no matter what.  You have contradicted yourself because you propose a solution which is workable and then posit that nothing will work.

The quote you question was a typo and should have read "games", it has been corrected.

You opine that you are a realist, I disagree and see you as a pessimist, that is my opinion.  We disagree.  I see reason for giving the big wigs a chance to resolve matters while you can only fathom the utter demise of the ACC.  While you may be right, I may be right as well.  I have offered proof of past success, and while you have only offered your opinions of past failures.  I am happy to entertain facts but opinions are not facts.  The fact remains that the ACC intelligently worked out a solution to ensure ND plays every ACC team in rotation, five games annually.  The ACC and ND have honored the agreement and have not breached.  If you have proof of a breach, I will review it.  That said, giving the parties a chance to resolve issues is not a Pollyanna approach.  This goes on daily in the business and governmental worlds.  I face issues daily and resolve problems.  I see the ACC and ND have a history of doing so.  Yes, I will give them a chance.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?