Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
ACC, PAC-12, and BIG alliance / conference realignment
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="HRE Otto IV, post: 4639865, member: 5685"] The earlier and more teams that leave the ACC, the more it makes sense for the left behinds to band together and split the exit fees. If let's say SU, Pitt, BC, Duke, Wake were left it makes more sense to split the 9 exit fees then to go to the B12. What is better... -having $150M now each from exit fees, getting $10M a year from TV, having lower travel costs, having greater access to the CFB Playoff, splitting playoff money and NCAAT credits 10 ways vs 20 ways, being regional, being more competitive, playing historical opponents, playing round robin schedules, which all likely mean higher attendance and ticket revenue or getting $30M a year from TV I think financially the next dozen or so years you are better off in the ACC. Past that it might be better to be in the B12 but both our FB and BBall programs would get lost in the shuffle. Are we playing sports to be competitive or to maximize profits? I rather win a watered down ACC FB CG once a decade then have a 7-5 season in the B12 be seen as a great season. I rather make the NCAAT playing Northeastern BBall opponents than being a bubble team every year in the B12 playing a national schedule. What good is $20M more a year from TV if it doesn't make you any better and you play in a 2nd tier B12 conference? I would be perfectly happy playing... FB Home 4 year cycle (road is the opposite) Year 1 Notre Dame, Nova, BC, Army, Duke Year 2 USF, Pitt, UConn, Navy, Wake Year 3 B16/SEC/B12 team, Nova, BC, Army, Duke Year 4 USF, Pitt, UConn, Navy, Wake Those road games are all easy to get to and are attractive locations. USF and Pitt would be big home games as those would be the primary challengers to the ACC CG. IMO in time I would expect the ACC CG to be USF three quarters of the time, Pitt half the time, SU a quarter of the time, and the other seven schools combined half the time. BBall Home and Road every year Notre Dame, USF, Nova, Pitt, BC, UConn, St Johns, Georgetown, Duke, Wake That is a great home conference schedule. You have road games in Tampa, Philly, Boston, NYC, DC, and at Cameron. Plus the ACCT in MSG. Which is nearly perfect. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
ACC, PAC-12, and BIG alliance / conference realignment
Top
Bottom