Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
ACC, PAC-12, and BIG alliance / conference realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="WoadBlue, post: 4704516, member: 1145"] Pac people always have been very arrogant. That includes the leadership and not just causal fans. So the Pac has always thought itself too good to think in terms of expanding way from the far west. They would have taken Big 12 teams, but only if Texas led the charge. By the 1990s, it should have been clear that what the Pac needed most were CST games for conference play and many more EST games in OOC play. Only then could Pac TV numbers grow. The Pac refused top see even as their TV numbers in both revenue sports kept dropping. Today, that means that Pac is as dead man walking as you say wit only 1 basic way out: the ACC. If the Pac could secure a deal with the ACC to play multiple IOOC games in both revenue sport each year, that might save the league for more than a few years, The only way I see a 'merger' is if the Pac reduced its members for that merger to no more than 7: Washington, Oregon, Cal, Stanford, Utah, Arizona St, and Arizona. And I think the Pac remains far too arrogant to make that move. Of course, I also see the ACC as far too arrogant to drop the total dead weight of Wake and BC and to force everybody to play as tough an OOC slate as possible every year. Pride goeth before the fall. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
ACC, PAC-12, and BIG alliance / conference realignment
Top
Bottom