Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="orangecuse, post: 4717801, member: 668"]
You can not say this with any certainty.  It may be unlikely, but to say it definitively is just your opinion...period.

Ultimately, it comes down to the [I][B]economics[/B][/I], etc. of challenging the GOR, with the large risks of the uncertainty that exists, lack of precedent, etc.  "Iron Clad" etc. gets thrown around a lot, but there are instances where legit arguments can be made to void such agreements.

In my past life, I dealt with many [I]hold-harmless agreements/contracts[/I], etc. that were alleged to be "iron clad" only not to be the case in reality.  For instance, you can not pass [I]negligence[/I] through a contract, etc., it makes the contract null and void.

Another thing that make contracts void is a contract that goes against public policy.  In FSU's case, as a public institution, they (as well as other publics) probably could make an argument(s) along these grounds, etc. albeit, still very high risk vs. [I]current/present day[/I] reward.

As time moves on, and the high risks ($$$) of challenging the GOR becomes much lessor, etc., it would not surprise me one bit if the legal challenge is commenced.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?