Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HRE Otto IV, post: 4724158, member: 5685"] Shouldn't the ACC try to position itself to be that 0.5 conference longterm? If in 5 years the B12 is getting offered $25M and the ACC is making $35M with 8 years left on the TV deal, wouldn't schools in the B12 have interest? Why should BC, SU, Pitt, Louisville, Duke, Wake (and maybe more) want to concede to the B12, especially after seeing what happened to Cal and Stanford? Wouldn't it be better to take in the B12 schools that fit with the above ACC schools, all the while swimming in that exit fee money? The schools that plan on leaving do not care. So if they don't care either way, shouldn't the ACC schools that risk becoming the next Cal or Stanford be pushing to raid the B12? The ACC has an Eastern core, the B12 a Texas core. If SU gets left behind, I rather the ACC win out as the #3 conference. [/QUOTE]