Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="WoadBlue, post: 4742906, member: 1145"]
It's behind the. scones, and it is NIOT al about getting FSU. FSU is just the easily riled idiot they can manipulate. THE plan is to make certain that no conference can ever be a truly Major conference other than BT and SEC. That can only happen if the ACC is reduced - because Pac is about dead, and Big 12 is seriously reduced.

Now the plan is to take apart the ACC. They will be done easiest off both Clemson and FSU are itching to leave ASAP. A truly major football conference must have at least a couple of schools with Large football fan bases. The ACC has only those 2. Lose both, and ACC football already will be reduced rather significantly. And that would then spur other schools desired by SEC and/or BT to explore.

What all schools left in the ACC after that process is done must accept and act on is that football fans trump even football winning and football winning trumps even basketball fans of the larger amounts. And to hoist up the football side of the league, you must have schools located in 'football states.' So, in terms of replenishing the ACC, Tulane is better than UConn because LA is a football state. CIncy over Tulane because OH is a football state and Cincy has many more football fans than Tulane. USF and UCF may both be required to replace FSU and have a major hold on FL 3* talent. VA produces much more football talent than PA, so JMU is better than Temple. If there are cracks in the Big 12, try to smash them into smithereens to take TTU, TCU, Baylor and possibly Houston. Securing that much of TX is more valuable than having KU basketball. SMU boosters wiped dearly love to manage that.

WVU belongs in the ACC for rivalries.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?